[Criminal Appeal No. 551 of 2012] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. The accused-appellant was charged under Sections 417, 376 and 306 of the Indian Penal Code1. The trial court acquitted him of all the above offences, but on appeal by the State of Karnataka to the High Court, he was convicted for the offences under Sections 417 […]
Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi Vs. State of Karnataka through SHO Kakati Police Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8478 of 2014] K.V. Viswanathan, J. 1. The present appeal arises from the judgment dated 30.06.2014 of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (for short the “APTEL”) in Appeal No. 29 of 2013. By the said judgement, the APTEL dismissed the appeal of the appellant and confirmed the order dated 12.11.2012 of the Punjab
Nabha Power Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. & Anr. Read More »
[Civil Appeal No._______ of 2024 @ SLP (C) No. 6176 of 2023] Sanjay Kumar, J 1. Leave granted. 2. On 13.04.2013, when she was still a child of less than twelve years of age, the appellant was involved in an accident that left her permanently disabled to the extent of 75%. The vehicle in which she was
[Criminal Appeal No.________ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1242 of 2021] C.T. Ravikumar, J. Leave granted. 1. An affirmative answer to the question of law raised before the High Court as to whether after the acceptance of a negative Final Report filed under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short,
Subrata Choudhury @ Santosh Choudhury & Ors. Vs. State of Assam & Anr. Read More »
[Miscellaneous Application No.________ of 2024 @ Diary No. 4407 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2019] [Miscellaneous Application No.________ of 2024 @ Diary No. 5682 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2019] [Miscellaneous Application No.________ of 2024 @ Diary No. 10291 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No.________ of
Mukul Kumar Tyagi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 1095 of 2013] Dipankar Datta, J. THE CHALLENGE 1. The final judgment and order dated 13th October, 20111 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh2, allowing the writ appeal3 presented by the first respondent, is under assail in the present appeal by special leave. BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS 2. The factual matrix of the
[Civil Appeal Nos.________ & ________ of 2024 @ SLP (C) Nos. 5077-5078 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos.________ & ________ of 2024 @ SLP (C) Nos. 4709-4710 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos.________ & ________ of 2024 @ SLP (C) Nos. 4723-4724 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos.________ & ________ of 2024 @ SLP (C) Nos. 7538-7539 of
Anoop M. and Ors. Vs. Gireeshkumar T.M. and Ors. Etc. Read More »
[Special Leave Petition (C) No. 25032 of 2014] Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. The present petition has been filed impugning order1 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court2. Along with the petition, an application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 1,633 days in filing the present petition. 2. A perusal of the
State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Mohan Lal Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 6772-6773 of 2023] Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. 1. A routine service dispute involving competing claims for appointment was transformed into a pleasurable discourse by the newly designated senior advocates of this court, Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Mr. Gagan Gupta. Mr. D.L. Chidananda, appearing for the respondent-State rose to
Chaitra Nagammanavar Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 2367 of 2024 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 5530 of 2023] Vishal Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 2368 of 2024 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 6321 of 2024 Diary No. 29192 of 2023] 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeals arise out of a decision of the High
Shankar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
