admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 157 of 2011] Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 2.3.2010, passed by the High Court of judicature at Calcutta in Criminal Appeal No. 235 of 1994 whereby said Court has dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence recorded by the Additional Sessions […]

[Criminal Appeal Nos.1969-1970 of 2010] [Criminal Appeal No.1971 of 2010] [Criminal Appeal Nos.1994-98 of 2010] [Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No. 636 of 2015 @ SLP (CRL.) No.8132 of 2010] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 639-40 of 2015 @ SLP (CRL.) Nos.9370-71 of 2011 SLP (CRL.) 9303 of 2011 SLP (CRL.) No.9369 of 2011] Fakkir

[Criminal Appeal No.637 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.1632 of 2015] K. Anbazhagan Vs. Selvi J. Jayalalitha and ANR. [Criminal Appeal No.638 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.2013 of 2015] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The question for consideration is whether Mr. G. Bhavani Singh appointed as a

[Civil Appeal No.5282 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. The facts necessary to decide this appeal are as follows. The appellant entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Limited for the purpose of construction of roads in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The Joint Venture was awarded a contract by

[Criminal Appeal No. 592 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 4425 of 2014] Prafulla C. Pant, J. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 20.3.2014, passed by the Gauhati High Court in Criminal Petition No. 287 of 2009, whereby said Court has dismissed the petition under Section 482 of the Code

[Civil Appeal No. 3563 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 5900 of 2014] Prafulla C. Pant, J. This appeal is directed against order dated 18.12.2013, passed by the High Court of Gujarat in Second Appeal No. 172 of 2013 whereby said Court has dismissed the appeal upholding the judgment and decree passed by

[Criminal Appeal No. 621 of 2013] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by special leave challenges the judgment and order dated 13.05.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 1501 of 2007 setting aside the judgment of acquittal rendered by the trial court and convicting the appellant under

[Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 124 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 125 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 126 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 127 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 128 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 130 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 131 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 132 of 2013] KURIAN,

[Civil Appeal No.3042 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. In this appeal we are concerned with the addition in the value for assessment to customs duty of charges paid by the respondent to Met Chem Canada Inc. for supply of technical services required for setting up and commissioning a plant for the manufacture of Hot

[I.A. No. 6/2015 & I.A. No. 7/2015 in Civil Appeal No (S).226-227/2015] O R D E R I.A. NO.6 Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant does not want to press this I.A. The I.A. is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. I.A. NO.7 I.A. No.7 is allowed in terms of prayer ‘a’.