[Civil Appeal No. 8980 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 313 of 2012] Rajesh Kumar Tiwary Vs. The Union of India & Ors. [S.L.P. (Civil) No. 31006 of 2012] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (Civil) No. 313 of 2012. 2. The question for consideration is whether, on the cancellation […]
[Criminal Appeal No.2070 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6220 of 2014] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This is an unfortunate case where the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are rendered simply a pious hope of the Parliament and a teasing illusion for the appellant.
Recent SC Judgement –Shalu Ojha Vs. Prashant Ojha – 18.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 4226 of 2012] KURIAN, J.: Construction by plaintiff, destruction by defendant. Construction by pleadings, proof by evidence; proof only by relevant and admissible evidence. Genuineness, veracity or reliability of the evidence is seen by the court only after the stage of relevancy and admissibility. These are some of the first principles of
Recent SC Judgement – Anvar P.V. Vs. P.K. Basheer – 18.09.14 Read More »
[Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 281-282 of 2014 in Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 34794-34795 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9220 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 15796 of 2014] [Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 281-282 of 2014 in Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 34794-34795 of 2011] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Mr. Sunil Kathuria, Chairman,
Recent SC Judgement – Delhi Development Authority Vs. Sunil Kathuria – 17.09.14 Read More »
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday dismisses pleas for interim stay on its single judge verdict quashing points for nursery admission in private schools. Chief justice G Rohini and Justice RS Endlaw dismissed the petitions for stay and they will hear the main pleas challenging the single bench order from January. The city government had
Delhi HC dismisses pleas seeking stay on point system for nursery system Read More »
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Opposition leader Imran Khan has been booked under terrorism act for allegedly inciting violence against Punjab’s former law minister RanaSanaullah during a rally in Faisalabad. The case was registered yesterday after Sanaullah said that Imran and other people incited the attack at his place after a person was killed in clashes during the
Imran Khan booked under terrorism act Read More »
The Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which empowers police to make arrests over social media posts, apparently lacked guidelines on when such power can be exercised and that somebody’s “annoyance” was enough in certain cases for invoking the law. “Section 66A does not give any specific guidance
[Criminal Appeal Nos.2065-2066 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) Nos.4682-4683 of 2012] (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The challenge in this appeal is to the orders dated 7/3/2012 and 12/3/2012 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court allowing the criminal revision petition filed by
[Civil Appeal Nos.8973-8973 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 975-976 of 2012] S. A. BOBDE, J. Leave granted. In these appeals, the question before us is whether having regard to the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 [hereinafter referred to as ‘RDB Act’], a suit containing
[Civil Appeal Nos. 8791-8818 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.36425-36452 of 2009] [Civil Appeal Nos. 8819-8831 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.36616-36628 of 2009] [Civil Appeal Nos. 832-8833 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.171-172 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 8834 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C)
Recent SC Judgement – Reliance Power Ltd. Vs. Babu Singh – 16.09.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
