Law Intellect India

admin

Gurgaon plots: HC dismisses DLF plea questioning CCI jurisdiction

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has dismissed KP Singh-led DLF Home Developers Ltd’s plea questioning whether the Competition Commission of India (CCI) had the jurisdiction to probe allegations of anti-competitive practices against it regarding its residential projects in Gurgaon. The CCI will decide the complaint case against DLF on merit, the court said. The […]

Gurgaon plots: HC dismisses DLF plea questioning CCI jurisdiction Read More »

Jayalalithaa’s Status as Prisoner 7402 to Continue At Least Till Friday

NEW DELHI:  Jayalalithaa, the former chief minister of Tamil Nadu, will spend this working week in jail in Bangalore. The Supreme Court has decided to hear her request for bail on Friday. The 66-year-old was arrested in September being given a four-year sentence for corruption while in office during her first term as Chief Minister from

Jayalalithaa’s Status as Prisoner 7402 to Continue At Least Till Friday Read More »

Income Tax case: Bombay HC rules in Vodafone’s favour

The Income Tax Department has yet again lost a legal battle against Vodafone India Tele Services after the Bombay high court ruled in favour of Vodafone in the transfer pricing case relating to undervaluation of share capital issued by Vodafone India Services Private Limited (Vodafone India) to its Mauritius parent. Vodafone had received a notice

Income Tax case: Bombay HC rules in Vodafone’s favour Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Saurabh Kumar through his father Vs. Jailor, Koneila Jail & ANR. – 22.07.2014

[Writ Petition (CRL.) No. 147 of 2013] N.V. Ramana, J. 1. This habeas corpus petition is filed by one Saurabh Kumar who is in Koneila Jail, Dalsingsarai, District Samastipur (Bihar). 2. In brief the case of the petitioner is that he was XII pass and wanted to leave the village in search of a decent

Recent SC Judgement – Saurabh Kumar through his father Vs. Jailor, Koneila Jail & ANR. – 22.07.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hitender Kumar Soni – 21.07.2014

[Civil Appeal No.10645 of 2010] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. As Appellants the Union of India and its concerned officials are aggrieved by the judgment and order under appeal dated 11.12.2008 passed by a Division Bench of High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Civil Writ Petition No.41 of 2001 whereby the High Court allowed the Writ

Recent SC Judgement – Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hitender Kumar Soni – 21.07.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Yogendra Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand & ANR. – 21.07.2014

[Criminal Appeal No.1205 of 2014] (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. The appellants are original Accused Nos.1 to 3 respectively in P.S. Meharma Case No.155 of 2004 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 504 and 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘the IPC’). The FIR was lodged on 23/09/1994

Recent SC Judgement – Yogendra Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand & ANR. – 21.07.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – G. Mohanasundaram Vs. R. Nanthagopal and Ors. – 21.07.2014

[Civil Appeal No. of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.26223 of 2013] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 8th July, 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Petition No.5508 of 2013. Initially, the

Recent SC Judgement – G. Mohanasundaram Vs. R. Nanthagopal and Ors. – 21.07.2014 Read More »

Madras High Court moots parents’ plight over marriageable age for girls

A Madras High Court Bench comprising of Justice S. Manikumar and Justice V.S. Ravi considered the concern shown by several parents regarding the rights of the parents to decide the future course of action, as regards education and marriage of their children, but restrained from issuing any orders in this respect, in view of the

Madras High Court moots parents’ plight over marriageable age for girls Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.