Armed with the multi-crore Saradha financial scam issue, the Congress and CPM launched attack on the TMC at two separate events here on Sunday. Congress leaders, holding a convention at Ashutosh College’s Memorial Hall said they would move Supreme Court against state law minister Chandrima Bhattacharya for “contempt of court”. “We have seen how the […]
Congress to move SC over TMC protest outside CBI office Read More »
Intensifying its probe into the multi-crore chit fund scam in Orissa, the CBI on Sunday night arrested Manoj Dash, owner of Oriya TV channel Kamyab TV, and Madhu Mohanty, owner of Oriya daily Odisha Bhaskar, over their alleged link with chit fund firm Artha Tatwa. Mohanty allegedly took Rs 65 lakh from Artha Tatwa chief
CBI arrests owners of two Orissa media groups Read More »
Besides the local population, the Army too has been hit by the floods in Jammu and Kashmir. With the Badami Bagh Cantonment, the headquarters of Srinagar-based 15 Corps, submerged, the ordnance depots, family quarters, vehicles and offices have been damaged. Moreover, landslides on the Jammu-Srinagar-Leh highway and other arterial roads have affected the Army’s crucial
Next on Army’s agenda, its own relief and rescue Read More »
GUWAHATI: A first-semester student of Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, was found dead on campus on Sunday. Police suspect Tushar Yadav committed suicide by jumping from the fourth floor of his hostel the previous night. Tushar, who was studying electronics communication and engineering, was from Gurgaon. Police said they had found a letter in Tushar’s
Gurgaon boy jumps to death at IIT Guwahati Read More »
[Civil Appeal No(S). 5848-49 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.29550-29551 of 2010] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are preferred by the appellant who was working as Assistant Engineer with respondent No.2. A disciplinary proceeding was initiated under Rule 85 of the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Employees Service Regulations,
[Criminal Appeal No. 1247 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.5826 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the impugned order dated 18.4.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2009 whereby the High Court allowed the
Recent SC Judgement – Bal Manohar Jalan Vs. Sunil Paswan– 30.06.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 5605 of 2010] O R D E R 1 This Appeal assails the Order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dated March 30, 2006 whereby WP(C) No.3923 of 2005 came to be dismissed. The prayer in the Writ Petition, inter alia, was for the
Recent SC Judgement – Sukhvinder Singh Vs. Union of India– 25.06.2014 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.1881 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No. 1884 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Both the appeals are preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.12.2010 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.927 of 2001. 2. The appellants 1 to 4 in Criminal Appeal No. 1884 of 2011,
Recent SC Judgement – Ganesh Datt Vs. State of Uttarakhand– 11.06.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.1022 of 2009] [Criminal Appeal No.1023 of 2009] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Both the appeals have been preferred against the judgment and final order dated 23.1.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.932 of 2004. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.1022 of 2009 Smt. Ashi Devi,
Recent SC Judgement – Ashi Devi & Ors. Vs. State of NCT, Delhi – 9.06.14 Read More »
[I.A. Nos. 101-103 in Contempt Petitions (C) No.412413 of 2012] [Civil Appeals No. 9813 and 9833 of 2011] [Contempt Petition (C) No.260 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.8643 of 2012] T.S. Thakur, J. 1. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (SHICL) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Saharas’ for short) invited
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
