admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 1247 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.5826 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the impugned order dated 18.4.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2009 whereby the High Court allowed the […]

[Criminal Appeal No.1881 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No. 1884 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Both the appeals are preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.12.2010 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.927 of 2001. 2. The appellants 1 to 4 in Criminal Appeal No. 1884 of 2011,

[Criminal Appeal No.1022 of 2009] [Criminal Appeal No.1023 of 2009] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Both the appeals have been preferred against the judgment and final order dated 23.1.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.932 of 2004. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.1022 of 2009 Smt. Ashi Devi,

[I.A. Nos. 101-103 in Contempt Petitions (C) No.412413 of 2012] [Civil Appeals No. 9813 and 9833 of 2011] [Contempt Petition (C) No.260 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.8643 of 2012] T.S. Thakur, J. 1. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (SHICL) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Saharas’ for short) invited

[Criminal Appeal Nos.1095-1097 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. These three appeals are preferred against the common judgment dated 16.7.2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1288 of 2006, 1362 of 2006 and 1408 of 2006. 2. The appellants herein are five in number and were

[Civil Appeal No. 6718 of 2013] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. We are informed that Dr. Aloys Wobben (appellant no.1, hereinafter referred to as, ‘the appellant’) is a scientist-engineer. It is also the case of the appellant, that he has to his credit several inventions in the field of wind turbine generators, and wind energy

[Civil Appeal No. 5765 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 20041 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi rendered in OMP No.46 of 2013 dated 22nd March, 2013. By the aforesaid judgment, the Delhi

[Arbitration Petition No. 34 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 11(4) read with Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”), with a prayer to appoint the nominee arbitrator of the Respondent and to further constitute the arbitral tribunal, by

[Civil Appeal No. 3879 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. This is a statutory appeal, preferred by Union of India, as provided under Section 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AFT Act’). The appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated April 15, 2011 passed by the Armed

[Criminal Appeal No(S).1570 of 2010] O R D E R A.K. SIKRI,J. The appellant was running a small kirana shop at 96-A, MIG Flats, Opposite G.T.B. Hospital, G.T.B. Enclave, Shahdara, Delhi. On 11.3.1993, some officials from the Food Adulteration Department visited his shop which was being run under the name and style “M/s Mithlesh General