admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 555 of 2010] Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J. 1. In this appeal, impugned judgment and order dated 5.2.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Contempt Application (Crl.) No. 15 of 2009, by which the appellant stood convicted for committing criminal contempt under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 2231 of 2010] Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 20.1.2010, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal appeal No.499-DB of 2001, affirming the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat dated 4.9.2001/7.9.2001, passed

[Criminal Appeal No. 1563 of 2010] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. That the present statutory appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 23.3.2010 whereby the High Court has convicted the appellant by reversing the judgment of the Trial Court, which had acquitted the appellant of the charges under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and

[Criminal Appeal No. 1521 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1526-1527 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 1519 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 1528 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. Six persons were accused of conspiring with each other and committing murder of one Ramesh Masta with common intention. FIR No. 414 dated November 06, 2004 was registered

[Criminal Appeal No. 1118 of 2014] A.K. SIKRI, J. The two appellants herein are aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court pronounced on July 27, 2011, whereby their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’), as recorded by the Magistrate, has been upheld and

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5589-5605 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5606-5608 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5609-5611 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5612 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5613 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5614-5621 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5622 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5623 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5624 of 2014] A.K.

[Civil Appeal No.6717 of 2008] Dipak Misra, J. 1. Calling in question the legal defensibility of the judgment and order dated 19.01.2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi in W.P.(C)No.16104 of 2004 whereby it has annulled the judgment and order dated 28.06.2004 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (for short

ITEM NO.1C COURT NO.2 SECTION II SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Md. Jamiluddin Nasir Vs. State of West Bengal [Criminal Appeal No(S). 1240-1241 of 2010] Aftab Ahmed Ansari @Aftab Ansari Vs. State of West Bengal [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1242-1243 of 2010] Date: 21/05/2014 These Appeals were called on for pronouncement of judgment today.

ITEM NO.1A COURT NO.2 SECTION IV [FOR JUDGMENT] SUPREME COURT OF INDIA B.S. Sandhu Vs. Government of India & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4684-4685 of 2005] Dashmesh Educational Society Vs. Punjab Urban Development Authority & Ors.] [Civil Appeal No. 4799-4800 of 2005] SURESH SHARMA & ORS. Vs. B.S. SANDHU & ORS. [Civil Appeal NO. 4798

The respondent while holding the post of District Manager in the Food Corporation of India (for short the FCI) was proceeded against in a disciplinary proceedings as contemplated under Regulation 60 of the Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971 (for brevity “the Regulations”) on the ground that during the period 15.7.99 to 21.1.02 while