admin

[Criminal Appeal No.1881 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No. 1884 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Both the appeals are preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.12.2010 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.927 of 2001. 2. The appellants 1 to 4 in Criminal Appeal No. 1884 of 2011, […]

[Criminal Appeal No.1022 of 2009] [Criminal Appeal No.1023 of 2009] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Both the appeals have been preferred against the judgment and final order dated 23.1.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.932 of 2004. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.1022 of 2009 Smt. Ashi Devi,

[I.A. Nos. 101-103 in Contempt Petitions (C) No.412413 of 2012] [Civil Appeals No. 9813 and 9833 of 2011] [Contempt Petition (C) No.260 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.8643 of 2012] T.S. Thakur, J. 1. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (SHICL) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Saharas’ for short) invited

[Criminal Appeal Nos.1095-1097 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. These three appeals are preferred against the common judgment dated 16.7.2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1288 of 2006, 1362 of 2006 and 1408 of 2006. 2. The appellants herein are five in number and were

[Civil Appeal No. 6718 of 2013] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. We are informed that Dr. Aloys Wobben (appellant no.1, hereinafter referred to as, ‘the appellant’) is a scientist-engineer. It is also the case of the appellant, that he has to his credit several inventions in the field of wind turbine generators, and wind energy

[Civil Appeal No. 5765 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 20041 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi rendered in OMP No.46 of 2013 dated 22nd March, 2013. By the aforesaid judgment, the Delhi

[Arbitration Petition No. 34 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 11(4) read with Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”), with a prayer to appoint the nominee arbitrator of the Respondent and to further constitute the arbitral tribunal, by

Civil Appeal Nos. 5478-5483 of 2014 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 24297-24302 of 2007) with Civil appeal nos. 1831-1836 of 2009, Civil Appeal No. 903 of 2010, Civil Appeal No. 7439 of 2009, Civil Appeal No. 8483 of 2003, Civil Appeal Nos. 5484-88 of 2014 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 24305- 24309 of 2007), Civil Appeal Nos. 5489-94 of 2014 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 208-213 of

Criminal Appeal No.1155 of 2014 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) 4419 of 2009) with Criminal AppealNos.1156-1157 of 2014 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) 3524-3525 of 2010), Criminal Appeal No. 1160 of 2014 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) Nos. 4105 of 2014 CRLMP 22781/2012)-Decided on 9-5-2014. Bomb Blast – Conviction upheld JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.:- On 26th January, 1996, a day of celebration

Civil Appeal Nos.1542-44 of 2001 with Civil Appeal Nos.1545-50 of 2001, Civil Appeal Nos.1551-56 of 2001, Civil Appeal No. 1864 of 2014 and Transferred Case (C) Nos. 12-13 of 2010-Decided on 9-5-2014. Practice and Procedure – Premature matter JUDGMENT Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.:- Civil Appeal Nos.1542-44 of 2001 have been preferred challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 24.11.2000, passed in Special Civil Application Nos.1189, 4494 and 4659 of