admin

Civil Appeal No. 4261 of 2007-Decided on 9-5-2014. Election – Misinformation or suppression of material information JUDGMENT A.K. Sikri, J.:- The appellant herein was the successful candidate in the election of legislative assembly, which he contested from 56, Ambernath Constituency, Thane District, Maharashtra. There were five candidates in the fray for which the elections were held on October 13, […]

Civil appeal no. 5569 of 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26741 of2011]-Decided on 9-5-2014. Eviction – Legal Heirs JUDGMENT C. Nagappan, J.:- Leave granted. 2.This appeal is directed against the order dated 9.2.2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in H.R.R.P. No.246 of 2010. 3.Briefly the facts are as follows : Narayanappa

Criminal Appeal No. 1166 of 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.84 of 2013] with Criminal Appeal No. 1181 of 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.85 of2013)-Decided on 9-5-2014. Criminal Breach of Trust – Sentence reduced JUDGMENT C. Nagappan, J.:- Leave granted in both the special leave petitions. CRMP No.3134 of 2013 and

Criminal Appeal No. 1168 of 2014 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5529 of 2011]-Decided on 9-5-2014. Quashing of FIR – Cheating – Quash set aside JUDGMENT C. Nagappan, J.:- Leave granted. CRMP No.12896 of 2011 seeking impleadment as a party is dismissed. 2.This appeal is preferred against order dated June 29, 2010, passed by the High Court of Calcutta

Civil Procedure – Order Rule 2 – Suit to include whole claim JUDGMENT Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.:- Leave granted.   2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated December 19, 2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Regular First Appeal No.1033 of 2005 partly allowing the appeal filed

[I.A. Nos. 101-103 in Contempt Petitions (C) No.412413 of 2012] [Civil Appeals No. 9813 and 9833 of 2011] [Contempt Petition (C) No.260 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.8643 of 2012] T.S. Thakur, J. 1. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (SHICL) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Saharas’ for short) invited

[Criminal Appeal Nos.1095-1097 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. These three appeals are preferred against the common judgment dated 16.7.2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1288 of 2006, 1362 of 2006 and 1408 of 2006. 2. The appellants herein are five in number and were

[Civil Appeal No. 6718 of 2013] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. We are informed that Dr. Aloys Wobben (appellant no.1, hereinafter referred to as, ‘the appellant’) is a scientist-engineer. It is also the case of the appellant, that he has to his credit several inventions in the field of wind turbine generators, and wind energy

[Arbitration Petition No. 34 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 11(4) read with Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”), with a prayer to appoint the nominee arbitrator of the Respondent and to further constitute the arbitral tribunal, by

[Civil Appeal No. 3879 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. This is a statutory appeal, preferred by Union of India, as provided under Section 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AFT Act’). The appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated April 15, 2011 passed by the Armed