Law Intellect India

admin

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Court Receiver, High Court of Bombay- May 09,2014

Civil Appeal No.5528 of 2014 [Arising out of SLP(C) No.30298 of 2010]-Decided on 9-5-2014. Civil Procedure – Powers of Receivers JUDGMENT Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.:- Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and order dated 16th September, 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Civil Revision Application No.452 of 2009, dismissing […]

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Court Receiver, High Court of Bombay- May 09,2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – Dhan Raj @ Dhand Vs. State of Haryana- May 09,2014

Criminal Appeal No. 1410 of 2010 with Criminal Appeal No. 703 of 2011-Decided on 9-5-2014. Murder – Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction set aside JUDGMENT Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.:- These appeals arise from the impugned judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana wherein vide a common judgment dated February 26, 2010, the High Court disposed of Criminal Appeal

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – Dhan Raj @ Dhand Vs. State of Haryana- May 09,2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – Subrata Chattoraj Vs. Union of India & Ors.- May 09,2014

Writ Petition (Civil) No.401 of 2013 with Writ Petition (Civil) No.402 of 2013, T.P. (C) No.445 of 2014, Writ Petition (Civil) No.413 of 2013 and Writ Petition (Civil) No.324 of 2014-Decided on 9-5-2014. CBI Investigation – Saradha Chitfund Scam – Allowed JUDGMENT T.S. Thakur, J.:- Writ Petitions seeking transfer of investigation from the State Agencies to the Central Bureau

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – Subrata Chattoraj Vs. Union of India & Ors.- May 09,2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – Swapnil and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh- May 09,2014

Criminal Appeal No. 1144 of 2014 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 8965/2013]-Decided on 9-5-2014. Quashing of Charges – Cruelty – Quashed JUDGMENT Kurian, J.:- Leave granted. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 02.09.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore. As per the impugned order, the High Court declined to exercise its

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – Swapnil and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh- May 09,2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – K. Narayanappa (D) By Lrs. Vs. R. Prakash– May 09, 2014

Civil Appeal No. 4261 of 2007-Decided on 9-5-2014. Election – Misinformation or suppression of material information JUDGMENT A.K. Sikri, J.:- The appellant herein was the successful candidate in the election of legislative assembly, which he contested from 56, Ambernath Constituency, Thane District, Maharashtra. There were five candidates in the fray for which the elections were held on October 13,

Recent SC Judgement – Recent SC Judgement – K. Narayanappa (D) By Lrs. Vs. R. Prakash– May 09, 2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – K. Narayanappa (D) By Lrs. Vs. R. Prakash– May 09,2014

Civil appeal no. 5569 of 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26741 of2011]-Decided on 9-5-2014. Eviction – Legal Heirs JUDGMENT C. Nagappan, J.:- Leave granted. 2.This appeal is directed against the order dated 9.2.2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in H.R.R.P. No.246 of 2010. 3.Briefly the facts are as follows : Narayanappa

Recent SC Judgement – K. Narayanappa (D) By Lrs. Vs. R. Prakash– May 09,2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Dayanand Ramkrishna Shet Vs. State of Karnataka – May 09,2014

Criminal Appeal No. 1166 of 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.84 of 2013] with Criminal Appeal No. 1181 of 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.85 of2013)-Decided on 9-5-2014. Criminal Breach of Trust – Sentence reduced JUDGMENT C. Nagappan, J.:- Leave granted in both the special leave petitions. CRMP No.3134 of 2013 and

Recent SC Judgement – Dayanand Ramkrishna Shet Vs. State of Karnataka – May 09,2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Mosiruddin Munshi Vs.Md. Siraj and Another – May 09,2014

Criminal Appeal No. 1168 of 2014 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5529 of 2011]-Decided on 9-5-2014. Quashing of FIR – Cheating – Quash set aside JUDGMENT C. Nagappan, J.:- Leave granted. CRMP No.12896 of 2011 seeking impleadment as a party is dismissed. 2.This appeal is preferred against order dated June 29, 2010, passed by the High Court of Calcutta

Recent SC Judgement – Mosiruddin Munshi Vs.Md. Siraj and Another – May 09,2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Coffee Board Vs. Ramesh Exports Pvt. Ltd. – May 09,2014

Civil Procedure – Order Rule 2 – Suit to include whole claim JUDGMENT Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.:- Leave granted.   2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated December 19, 2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Regular First Appeal No.1033 of 2005 partly allowing the appeal filed

Recent SC Judgement – Coffee Board Vs. Ramesh Exports Pvt. Ltd. – May 09,2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. – 04.06.2014

[I.A. Nos. 101-103 in Contempt Petitions (C) No.412413 of 2012] [Civil Appeals No. 9813 and 9833 of 2011] [Contempt Petition (C) No.260 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.8643 of 2012] T.S. Thakur, J. 1. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (SHICL) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Saharas’ for short) invited

Recent SC Judgement – Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. – 04.06.2014 Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.