admin

[Civil Appeal No. 5513 of 2014 Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 35943 of 2012] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants, who are the landlords, seek to challenge the order dated 20.09.2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi granting leave to the respondent-tenant to contest the proceedings for his […]

[Criminal Appeal No.1133 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 2531 of 2014] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant, who is the wife of one Cherukuri Narendra Chowdari-detenu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh alleging that her husband

[Civil Appeal No.4223 of 2012] A.K.SIKRI,J. 1. Respondent No.3 is a consumer (hereinafter referred to as the “consumer”) of electricity (LT-II Category) whose premises are situated within area of supply of the appellant namely Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST). In April 2009, he approached respondent No.2 i.e. Tata Power Company Limited (TPC) with

[Civil Appeal No. 5989 of 2008] [Civil Appeal No.5992 of 2008] [Civil Appeal No.5993 of 2008] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. The Appellant herein, National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO) has established two schools for the benefit of the wards of its- employees. These schools are known as Saraswati Vidaya Mandir (SVM) and located at NALCO Nagar

[Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 6873 of 2010] [SLP (C) No. 23796-23798/2010 Contmt. Pet. (CRL.) No. 4/13 in SLP (CRL.) No. 6873 of 2010] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. A spate of litigation between the two groups depicts a severe fight between them where settlement appears to be a distant dream, at least as of now,

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5478-5483 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 24297-24302 of 2007] DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. These appeals have arisen from the impugned judgment and order dated 11.5.2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 2529 of 1985; 889 of 1986; 988 of 1986; 2155 of 1987;

[Civil Appeal No. 5387 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11686 of 2007] [Civil Appeal No. 5388 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.10281 of 2009] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5389-5390 of 2014 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.18804-18805 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No. 5391 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13199 of

[Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 88-89 of 2013 in Civil Appeal No. 8226-8227 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. These contempt proceedings arise out of the judgment and order dated 23.11.2012 passed by this Court in CA Nos. 8226-8227 of 2012. Before we take note of the exact nature of directions given in that judgment which

[Civil Appeal No. 5379-5380/2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition(C) Nos.10265-10266 of 2014] M.Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. Appellants have preferred these appeals by special leave against the interim order dated 3.4.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi in LPA No.238 of 2014 and LPA No. 237 of 2014 whereby the Division

[Original Suit No. 3 of 2006] R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. This Court remains seized of the problem with regard to the water level of Mullaperiyar dam after it had solved on 27.02.2006 (Mullaperiyar Environmental Protection Forum[1]) because the Kerala State Legislature enacted the law immediately thereafter fixing and limiting Full Reservoir Level (FRL) to 136