admin

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 38 of 1997] Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 21 of 2004] R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. Section 6-A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (for short, ‘the DSPE Act’), which was inserted by Act 45 of 2003, reads as under: “Section 6-A. […]

[I.A. No.4 In Writ Petition (Civil) No. 60 of 2013] ORDER It is brought to our notice that by our judgment dated 22nd April, 2014 passed in Writ Petition (Civil) No.60 of 2013 and other connected matters, we had directed that the petitioners in the writ petitions can approach the High Court for the redressal

[Civil Appeal Nos. 3283 and 4491 of 2009 and 4898 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 5592 of 2008] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment delivered in ITA No. 520 of 2006 dated 19th January, 2007, by the High Court of Delhi, this Appeal has been filed by the Commissioner of Income

[Criminal Appeal No. 942 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) 9658 of 2009] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The centripodal question that arises for consideration in this appeal, by special leave, preferred by the injured, is whether the learned single Judge of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, while converting the

[Criminal Appeal No. 1287 of 2011] Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal arises out of final judgment and order dated 21.9.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Referred Trial No. 1 of 2010 and Criminal Appeal No. 299 of 2010 confirming the judgment and order of death sentence dated 12.3.2010

[Civil Appeal No. 3880 of 2003] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment delivered on 19th September, 2002 in Income Tax Appeal No.19 of 2001 by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, this appeal has been filed by the assessee, which is a co-operative society. When the appeal was

[Special Leave Petition No. 4495 of 2013] VIKRAMAJIT SEN J. 1. By means of this Special Leave Petition the endeavour of the petitioner, State of Uttarakhand, is to dislodge and reverse the findings of the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Writ Petition No.1478 of 2003, which Order has

[Contempt Petitions (C) No.445-449 of 2013] [Civil Appeal Nos. 4947-4951 of 2014 Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.36274-36278 of 2010] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against an order dated 9th March, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad whereby the High Court has set

[Civil Appeal Nos. 4915-4918 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 25950-25953 of 2011] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 8th July, 2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Misc. Nos.11669-C to 11672-C of 2010 in R.S.A.

[Civil Appeal No. 4919 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 3353 of 2009] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 2nd May, 2008 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla in R.S.A. No.126 of 1996. By the impugned judgment and