[Civil Appeal No. 7377 of 2008] [Civil Appeal Nos. 8635-8636 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 8637-8638 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 6184-6185 of 2010] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Civil Appeal No. 7377 of 2008 is filed against the judgment and order dated 19.10.2005 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh […]
Recent SC Judgement – Bhupal Singh Vs. State of Haryana – 01.04.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8912 of 2003] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. What is the correct method of computation of deductions under Section 80HHC(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the given facts and circumstances, is the question which needs an answer in the present appeal. 2. The given facts and circumstances, as they appear on
[Civil Appeal No.3238 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 1865 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-claimants against the Judgment and order dated 25.07.2013 passed in FAO No. 1652 of 2010 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, wherein the High
Recent SC Judgement – Chanderi Devi Vs. Jaspal Singh – 31.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos.2729-2730 of 2004] R. F. NARIMAN, J. The present case concerns itself with a classification issue. The facts necessary to appreciate the controversy are as follows: – The appellant manufactures security holograms. At the very beginning of the manufacturing process, they use coated metallised film which we are informed is classified under Tariff
NEW DELHI: In a major embarrassment to former CBI chief Ranjit Sinha, the Supreme Court on Thursday said that probe against him is needed for allegedly protecting accused of coal scam. A bench headed by Madan B Lokur said that Sinha meeting various accused multiple times, when the probe against them was on, is highly
Coalgate: Ex-CBI chief Ranjit Sinha needs to probed for protecting accused, SC says Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that no one had the poetic license to use a historically respected person like Mahatma Gandhi as a character and attribute obscene words to him in any fiction, poetry or any type of literary work. A bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra said if an author, writer
Cannot attribute obscene words to Mahatma Gandhi: SC Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed Arvind Kejriwal-led AAP government’s circular which said that the government will pursue the case against any person for making defamatory allegation against its employees. A bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra stayed the circular issued on May 6 allowing the government to proceed against a person who
SC stays Kejriwal govt’s circular on defamation proceedings against media houses Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2807 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. In the present appeal filed by the assessee, it is seeking refund of duty which was initially paid by M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘BPCL’). According to the appellant, this duty was paid by it to the BPCL on purchase of Naphtha
[Criminal Appeal No.520 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 5825 of 2014] Dipak Misra, J. Long back, an eminent thinker and author, Sophocles, had to say: “Law can never be enforced unless fear supports them.” Though the aforesaid statement was made centuries back, it has its pertinence, in a way, with the enormous
Recent SC Judgement – State of Punjab Vs. Saurabh Bakshi – 30.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2609 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant herein was engaged in the manufacture of certain articles from vulcanized rubber as bushes for use in the motor vehicles. Indubitably, the appellant is a Small Scale Industrial unit (hereinafter referred to as ‘SSI’ for short). The appellant has its own brand name
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
