admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 831 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 8914 of 2013] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is the second accused (hereinafter referred to as ‘A- 2’) in CC No. 48 of 2011 (RC 27(A)/2004) in the Court of the Special Judge (SPE/CBI), Thiruvananthapuram. He is […]

[Civil Appeal No. 1672 of 2010] P. Sathasivam, CJI. 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned final judgment and order dated 04.01.2007 passed by the Gauhati High Court in MAC Appeal No. 30 of 2003 whereby the High Court held that the claimant/appellant herein is entitled to a sum of Rs. 1,94,400/- as compensation

[Civil Appeal No. 4412 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (c) no.27082 of 2012] Pramodini Ambadas Lad Vs. Chancellor Dr. P.D.K. Vidyapeeth & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4413 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (c) no.28373 of 2012] Parikshit Vinayak Shingrup & Ors. Vs. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4414 of

[Civil Appeal No.1195 of 2007] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. 1. State of Rajasthan has preferred this Civil Appeal to assail the judgment and order dated 19.3.2004 in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.136/1995. By the impugned judgment, the High Court allowed the Second Appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of Trial Court as well as

[Criminal Appeal No. of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.9014 of 2013] VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In this Appeal we are confronted with the concurrent conviction of the Appellant under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), although the findings of the two Courts substantially differ. The High Court has set

[Civil Appeal No.4457 of 2005] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants questioning the correctness of the judgment and final Order dated 2.9.2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ No. 4688 of 1974, urging various facts and legal contentions in justification of their claim.

[Civil Appeal No. 5766 of 2007] V.Gopala Gowda, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellant questioning the correctness of the judgment and final Order dated 3.8.2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 9989 of 1985 urging various facts and legal contentions in justification of

[Criminal Appeal No. of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.814 of 2014] K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment of the Kerala High Court in Crl. Appeal No.1104 of 2004, by which the High Court modified the sentence awarded by the trial Court to that

[Civil Appeal No. 4126 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. This statutory appeal under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) is directed against the final judgment and order dated 22nd February, 2013 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (hereinafter referred to as “APTEL” or “Appellate Tribunal”),

[Civil Appeal No.4383 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.4926 of 2006] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Aggrieved by the common judgment dated 28th January 2006 in Writ Petition No.8063 of 2004 and Writ Appeal No.1035 of 2004 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, the third respondent