admin

[Civil Appeal No. 4424 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 20558 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 4425 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 29008 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 4426 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 29009 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 4427 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. […]

[Civil Appeal No. 481 of 2009] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. This is a plaintiff’s appeal against a decree of reversal made by the High Court of Madras by its judgment and order dated 28.04.2006. 2. The facts, which are not in dispute, are as follows:- The plaintiff is a company engaged in the manufacture and

[Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.9752 of 2010] R.M. LODHA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The only question that arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave is, whether the post-dated cheques issued by the appellants (hereinafter referred to as ‘purchasers’) as an advance payment in respect of

[Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 125 of 2013] [Writ Petition (CRL.) No.251 of 2011] J U D G M E N T RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. The petitioner in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 125 of 2013 is the Political Secretary of J & K National Panthers Party (JKNPP) which is a political party recognised by the

[Criminal Appeal No. 831 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 8914 of 2013] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is the second accused (hereinafter referred to as ‘A- 2’) in CC No. 48 of 2011 (RC 27(A)/2004) in the Court of the Special Judge (SPE/CBI), Thiruvananthapuram. He is

[Civil Appeal No. 1672 of 2010] P. Sathasivam, CJI. 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned final judgment and order dated 04.01.2007 passed by the Gauhati High Court in MAC Appeal No. 30 of 2003 whereby the High Court held that the claimant/appellant herein is entitled to a sum of Rs. 1,94,400/- as compensation

[Civil Appeal No. 4412 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (c) no.27082 of 2012] Pramodini Ambadas Lad Vs. Chancellor Dr. P.D.K. Vidyapeeth & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4413 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (c) no.28373 of 2012] Parikshit Vinayak Shingrup & Ors. Vs. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4414 of

[Civil Appeal No.1195 of 2007] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. 1. State of Rajasthan has preferred this Civil Appeal to assail the judgment and order dated 19.3.2004 in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.136/1995. By the impugned judgment, the High Court allowed the Second Appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of Trial Court as well as

[Criminal Appeal No. of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.9014 of 2013] VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In this Appeal we are confronted with the concurrent conviction of the Appellant under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), although the findings of the two Courts substantially differ. The High Court has set

[Civil Appeal No.4457 of 2005] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants questioning the correctness of the judgment and final Order dated 2.9.2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ No. 4688 of 1974, urging various facts and legal contentions in justification of their claim.