admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 698 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 10337 of 2013] Balkrishan Rajendraprasad Chaubey Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & ANR. [Criminal Appeal No. 699 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 10600 of 2013] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. Leave granted in both the appeals. 2. These appeals are directed against […]

[Civil Appeal No.2529 of 2002] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. By a communication dated 17.5.2000 issued by the Registrar General of the Patna High Court the respondent herein was informed that he would retire from the service on completion of 58 years of age. The said communication of the Registrar General was, inter alia, based on

[Suo Motu Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 24 of 2014] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. This Court, based on the news item published in the Business and Financial News dated 23.01.2014 relating to the gang-rape of a 20 year old woman of Subalpur Village, P.S. Labpur, District Birbhum, State of West Bengal on the intervening night of 20/21.01.2014

[Civil Appeal No. 2240 of 2006] O R D E R 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in W.P. [T] No.4572 of 2004, dated 22.06.2005. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has set aside the letter issued by the

CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,J. Petitioners have been summoned in a complaint case for commission of offence under Section 323, 380 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”. Respondent No. 1 filed a complaint in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Jangipur, Murshidabad on 1st

[Criminal Appeal No.686/2014 arising out of S.L.P.(Criminal) No.9547 of 2013] A.K.SIKRI,J. 1. The present Special Leave Petition has been preferred against the impugned judgment/final order dated 8.10.2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.27343/2013. It was a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

[Criminal Appeal No. 687 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 2634 of 2013] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. Leave granted. 2. The above appeal is filed against the final impugned judgment and order dated 29.06.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Writ Petition No. 220 of 2010 wherein the High

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 583 of 2003] [Contempt Petition (C) No. 132 of 2012] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 583 of 2003] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. The above writ petition has been filed by the petitioners as a Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus

[Criminal Appeal No.1310 of 2010] K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. We are, in this appeal, concerned with the question whether the pardon granted by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari, Delhi, under Section 306 Cr.P.C. to the second Respondent, against whom R.C. No.15(A) 96 DLI dated 29.2.1996 under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

K. S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. The appellant Mangat Ram, a member of SC community, married the deceased Seema, a member of the Aggarwal community on 13.7.1993 at Ambala. Few months after the marriage, on 15.9.1993, according to the prosecution, the appellant sprinkled kerosene oil on the body of the deceased and set her on fire,