admin

VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. A neat legal nodus of ubiquitous manifestation and gravity has arisen before us. It partakes the character of a general principle of law with significance sans systems and States. The futility of the Appellant’s endeavours to secure anticipatory bail having attained finality, he had once again knocked at the […]

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 116 of 1998] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 115 of 1998] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 430 of 2000] [Civil Appeal No. 6442 of 1998] [Civil Appeal No. 6443 of 1998] R.M. LODHA, J. : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 116 of 1998 1. In this Writ Petition filed by the petitioner – a

[Civil Appeal No. 4026 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.12463/2012] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated February 21, 2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in W.P. No.38280/2011. 3. The facts of the case reveal that on February 19,

[Civil Appeal No. 4023 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 3396 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 4024 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3397 of 2011] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against an order dated August 3, 2010 passed by the High Court

[Civil Appeal No. 3122 of 2006] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. The present appeal has been filed assailing the order dated April 13, 2005 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as “the National Commission”) in Revision Petition Nos. 534-537 of 2005, affirming the order dated November 10, 2004 passed by

[Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 155 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Crl.) Nos. 158, 165, 170, 171, 179, 181 196, 206 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 11 of 2014] [Contempt Petition (Crl.) No………….of 2014 (D1372) in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 155 of 2013] [Transferred Case (Civil) Nos. 123, 124 and 125 of 2013] [Transfer Petition (Civil)

Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated April 16, 2013 passed by the High Court of Uttrakhand affirming the award dated December 3, 2012 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Haridwar in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.75/2011. The Tribunal directed the respondent – Oriental Insurance

[Civil Appeal No. 4003 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8578 of 2011] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against an order passed by the High Court dated February 10, 2011 whereby the application filed by the respondent herein under Order VII Rule 11 of the

[Civil Appeal No. 4002 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 15664 of 2010] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order passed by the High Court wherein the High Court was pleased to set aside the order passed by the Executing

[Civil Appeal No. 6220 of 2008] N.V. RAMANA,J. 1. The short question, which arises for consideration in this appeal, is who is liable to pay the amount of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udham Singh Nagar (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in M.A.C.P. No. 98/2003 vide Award dated 06.08.2004. 2. Brief facts of