admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 687 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 2634 of 2013] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. Leave granted. 2. The above appeal is filed against the final impugned judgment and order dated 29.06.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Writ Petition No. 220 of 2010 wherein the High […]

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 583 of 2003] [Contempt Petition (C) No. 132 of 2012] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 583 of 2003] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. The above writ petition has been filed by the petitioners as a Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus

[Criminal Appeal No.1310 of 2010] K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. We are, in this appeal, concerned with the question whether the pardon granted by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari, Delhi, under Section 306 Cr.P.C. to the second Respondent, against whom R.C. No.15(A) 96 DLI dated 29.2.1996 under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

K. S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. The appellant Mangat Ram, a member of SC community, married the deceased Seema, a member of the Aggarwal community on 13.7.1993 at Ambala. Few months after the marriage, on 15.9.1993, according to the prosecution, the appellant sprinkled kerosene oil on the body of the deceased and set her on fire,

VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. A neat legal nodus of ubiquitous manifestation and gravity has arisen before us. It partakes the character of a general principle of law with significance sans systems and States. The futility of the Appellant’s endeavours to secure anticipatory bail having attained finality, he had once again knocked at the

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 116 of 1998] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 115 of 1998] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 430 of 2000] [Civil Appeal No. 6442 of 1998] [Civil Appeal No. 6443 of 1998] R.M. LODHA, J. : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 116 of 1998 1. In this Writ Petition filed by the petitioner – a

[Civil Appeal No. 4026 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.12463/2012] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated February 21, 2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in W.P. No.38280/2011. 3. The facts of the case reveal that on February 19,

[Civil Appeal No. 4023 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 3396 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 4024 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3397 of 2011] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against an order dated August 3, 2010 passed by the High Court

[Civil Appeal No. 3122 of 2006] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. The present appeal has been filed assailing the order dated April 13, 2005 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as “the National Commission”) in Revision Petition Nos. 534-537 of 2005, affirming the order dated November 10, 2004 passed by

[Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 155 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Crl.) Nos. 158, 165, 170, 171, 179, 181 196, 206 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 11 of 2014] [Contempt Petition (Crl.) No………….of 2014 (D1372) in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 155 of 2013] [Transferred Case (Civil) Nos. 123, 124 and 125 of 2013] [Transfer Petition (Civil)