[Civil Appeal Nos.3211-3212 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 1668-1669 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the final judgment and order dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in M.A. No.480 of 2008, wherein the High Court […]
Recent SC Judgement – Asha Verman Vs. Maharaj Singh – 27.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos.3209-3210 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.7105-7106 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Delay condoned. Leave granted. These appeals have been filed by the appellant against the final judgment and order dated 23.07.2013 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 551 of 2013 in Misc. Civil Application No.3071 of 2012 in Special
The National Green Tribunal has directed Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) to take action against ceramic industries allegedly operating without consent and not adhering to mandatory pollution norms in Uttar Pradesh’s Khurja city. A bench headed by Justice U D Salvi also directed UPPCB and its regional officer to submit list of such industries
NGT orders action against ceramic units running without consent in Uttar Pradesh Read More »
Unidentified assailants on Wednesday allegedly shot another key witness in the rape case against Narayan Sai, son of self-styled ‘godman’ Asaram, in Haryana’s Panipat district. This is a sixth case of attack on a witness in rape cases against Asaram and his son Narayan Sai. The incident occurred in Sanauli village in Panipat district where
Another key witness in Narayan Sai case attacked in Haryana Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused immediate reference to an 11-judge bench the adjudication of constitutional validity of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act and said its five-judge bench would hear arguments on both the NJAC as well as reference to a larger bench. The five-judge bench of Justices J S Khehar,
Not sending NJAC case to 11-judge bench: SC Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 205 of 2009] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. This is an appeal by the Complainant against the impugned judgment and order dated 30-04-2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.1674 of 2006. In the impugned judgment the High Court had allowed the appeal of three accused
Recent SC Judgement – Ranbeer Singh (D) by LRS. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 27.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 3213 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.5840 of 2012] N.M. Ravi Vs. P.R. Yelumalai [Civil Appeal No. 3214 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.10852 of 2013] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave is granted in both the matters. 2. These cross appeals have been filed against the judgment
Recent SC Judgement – P.R. Yelumalai Vs. N.M. Ravi – 27.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 7130 of 2003] A.K.SIKRI, J. 1. The first respondent herein wanted to import into India a trophy of one stuffed leopard which he shot in Zambia. Leopard is protected and prohibited specie under Schedule I of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and also under the Convention of International Trade on Endangered
Recent SC Judgement – Regional Deputy Director Vs. Zavaray S. Poonawala – 26.03.15 Read More »
Interlocutory Application No.2 Of 2014 (For Correction/Modification of Appearance in Order Dated 08.12.2014 and Judgment Dated 16.12.2014 [Civil Appeal No.11439 of 2014] O R D E R Mr. Vikas Mehta, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant-Respondent No.4 has submitted that Shri Aditya Sondhi, learned senior counsel, had in fact not appeared in the matter and
Recent SC Judgement – T.N. Raghupathy Vs. High Court of Karnataka – 26.03.15 Read More »
MUMBAI: The Crime Against Women cell on Tuesday filed a charge sheet against Indian Police Service officer Sunil Paraskar (57) for allegedly raping a 29-year-old model. The cops filed the charge sheet in a Borivili court. Paraskar is the first Maharashtra IPS officer to be charge sheeted on rape case.Evidence has been found against Paraskar,
Charge Sheet against IPS officer Paraskar filed in model rape case Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
