admin

[Criminal Appeal No.444 of 2008] CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,J. In the present appeal by way of special leave, we are concerned with appellants Vijay Singh and Hari Singh. According to the prosecution, on 16th of June, 1992 at about 6.30 A.M., a report was lodged by the informant, Pohap Singh (PW-1), alleging that while he was […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 1027 of 2008] Chelameswar, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 359 of 2003 of the High Court of Patna, the instant appeal is preferred by the Union of India. 2. By the judgment under appeal, three appeals came to be preferred by the three different accused who were

[Criminal Appeal No. 213 of 2006] [Criminal Appeal No. 215 of 2006] [Criminal Appeal No. 217 of 2006] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. The question arising for consideration in these appeals relates to the alleged failure (and consequential effect) of Pradip Sarkar to specifically state in his complaint filed under Sections 138 and 141 of

[Special Leave Petition (C) No.36518 of 2013] [Special Leave Petition (C) No.37456 of 2013] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. The question before us is whether a landlord can maintain a suit for eviction of his tenant even after an award has been passed in respect of the tenanted property under the provisions of the Land

[Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6609-6613 of 2014] O R D E R 1. These petitions have been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 22.11.2013, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing the Civil Misc. Applications in RFA No.5793 of 2012 for condonation of delay of more than10 years

[Civil Appeal No. 3865 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.24915 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 3866 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.25448 of 2012] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These special leave petitions are directed against the final judgment and order dated 14th June, 2011 passed by the Madras High Court

Tarabai Prabhakarrao Nalawade & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 3867 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.27916 of 2009] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd March, 2009 of the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rendered in First Appeal No.468 of

[CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4104 of 2007] O R D E R Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as ‘Corporation’) against the judgment and order dated 8.11.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench) in S.B. Civil Second

[Civil Appeal Nos.2924 – 2925 of 2014] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. These appeals are preferred against the judgment and decree dated 23.3.2007 in R.S.A. No.116 of 2000 and the order dated 1.4.2008 in Review Petition no.1 of 2008 passed by the learned single Judge of the Guwahati High Court, whereby the High Court has partly

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5698-5699 of 2009] M.Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 8.1.2009 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in C.W.P. No.8864 of 2007 and also order dated 27.3.2009 passed in Review Petition No. 112 of 2009, whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent