admin

Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated April 16, 2013 passed by the High Court of Uttrakhand affirming the award dated December 3, 2012 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Haridwar in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.75/2011. The Tribunal directed the respondent – Oriental Insurance […]

[Civil Appeal No. 4003 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8578 of 2011] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against an order passed by the High Court dated February 10, 2011 whereby the application filed by the respondent herein under Order VII Rule 11 of the

[Civil Appeal No. 4002 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 15664 of 2010] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order passed by the High Court wherein the High Court was pleased to set aside the order passed by the Executing

[Civil Appeal No. 6220 of 2008] N.V. RAMANA,J. 1. The short question, which arises for consideration in this appeal, is who is liable to pay the amount of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udham Singh Nagar (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in M.A.C.P. No. 98/2003 vide Award dated 06.08.2004. 2. Brief facts of

[Criminal Appeal No.444 of 2008] CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,J. In the present appeal by way of special leave, we are concerned with appellants Vijay Singh and Hari Singh. According to the prosecution, on 16th of June, 1992 at about 6.30 A.M., a report was lodged by the informant, Pohap Singh (PW-1), alleging that while he was

[Criminal Appeal No. 1027 of 2008] Chelameswar, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 359 of 2003 of the High Court of Patna, the instant appeal is preferred by the Union of India. 2. By the judgment under appeal, three appeals came to be preferred by the three different accused who were

[Criminal Appeal No. 213 of 2006] [Criminal Appeal No. 215 of 2006] [Criminal Appeal No. 217 of 2006] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. The question arising for consideration in these appeals relates to the alleged failure (and consequential effect) of Pradip Sarkar to specifically state in his complaint filed under Sections 138 and 141 of

[Special Leave Petition (C) No.36518 of 2013] [Special Leave Petition (C) No.37456 of 2013] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. The question before us is whether a landlord can maintain a suit for eviction of his tenant even after an award has been passed in respect of the tenanted property under the provisions of the Land

[Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6609-6613 of 2014] O R D E R 1. These petitions have been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 22.11.2013, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing the Civil Misc. Applications in RFA No.5793 of 2012 for condonation of delay of more than10 years

[Civil Appeal No. 3865 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.24915 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 3866 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.25448 of 2012] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These special leave petitions are directed against the final judgment and order dated 14th June, 2011 passed by the Madras High Court