admin

Tarabai Prabhakarrao Nalawade & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 3867 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.27916 of 2009] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd March, 2009 of the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rendered in First Appeal No.468 of […]

[CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4104 of 2007] O R D E R Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as ‘Corporation’) against the judgment and order dated 8.11.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench) in S.B. Civil Second

[Civil Appeal Nos.2924 – 2925 of 2014] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. These appeals are preferred against the judgment and decree dated 23.3.2007 in R.S.A. No.116 of 2000 and the order dated 1.4.2008 in Review Petition no.1 of 2008 passed by the learned single Judge of the Guwahati High Court, whereby the High Court has partly

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5698-5699 of 2009] M.Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 8.1.2009 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in C.W.P. No.8864 of 2007 and also order dated 27.3.2009 passed in Review Petition No. 112 of 2009, whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent

[Criminal Appeal No.1823 of 2008] K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. Appellant herein, accused No.1 (A-1) along with his father, accused No.2 (A-2) was charge-sheeted for the offences of murder of his wife under Sections 302, 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. A-1 and A-2 were found guilty and sentenced to suffer imprisonment

[Criminal Appeal No. 595 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.3634 of 2013] C. NAGAPPAN, J. Leave granted. 1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur, in D.B. Crl. Appeal No.515 of 2004. 2. The appellant herein Kanhaiya Lal, is accused No.2

[Civil Appeal No. 3958 of 2014 Special Leave Petition (C.) No.10542 of 2011] [C.A.No.3959 of 2014 @ S.L.P. (C) No.11943 of 2011] [C.A.No.3960 of 2014 @ S.L.P. (C) No.17662 of 2011] [C.A.No.3961 of 2014 @ S.L.P. (C) No.17656 of 2011] [C.A.No.3962 of 2014 @ S.L.P. (C) No.17661 of 2011] [C.A.No.3963 of 2014 @ S.L.P. (C)

[Criminal Appeal No. 1159 of 2005] Prem Nath and Another Vs. State of Haryana [Criminal Appeal No. 603 of 2005] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. The two questions for consideration and discussion relate to the value of the testimony of alibi witnesses and the severability of a dying declaration. 2. In the present appeals, we

[Writ Petition (C) No. 157 of 2013] Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred, by an organisation dedicated to the welfare of inter-state migrants, in the nature of public interest seeking exercise of this court’s extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 957 of 2013] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. A young law student of Bangalore, who belongs to the State of Odisha, has filed the present application under Article 32 of the Constitution highlighting what she has perceived to be a serious infringement of the fundamental rights guaranteed by Article 21 consequent to