admin

[I.A. Nos. 2143 with 2283, 3088, 3461, 3479, 3693 In 2143, 827, 1122, 1337, 1473 and 1620 and 1693 in 1473 And 3618 in] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. This order will dispose of the I. As. noted above. 2. Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995 was […]

[Contempt Petition (C) No. 422 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 25 of 2008] O R D E R 1. This contempt petition is filed by the petitioner inter alia requesting this Court to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for alleged disobedience of the judgment and order passed by this Court

[Transfer Petition (CRL.) No. 89 of 2013] [Transfer Petition (CRL.) No. 100 of 2013] [Transfer Petition (CRL.) No. 108 of 2013] [Transfer Petition (CRL.) No. 124 of 2013] [Transfer Petition (CRL.) No. 125 of 2013] O R D E R Heard learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as learned Additional

[Criminal Appeal No. 585 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 766 of 2014] O R D E R 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. Against the grant of bail in favour of the Respondent No.1-accused viz. Vishnu Narain Shivpuri, the complainant has filed the above appeal. 4. Respondent

[Civil Appeal No. 5764 of 2008] N.V.RAMANA,J. 1. The appellants by way of this appeal has impugned the judgment dated 27.03.2006 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in FAO No. 441 of 2003 whereby the amount of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mandi (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in

[Civil Appeal No. 3334 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 15165 of 2010] A. K. PATNAIK, J. 1. Leave granted. Facts of the Case 2. The appellants have inducted the respondents as tenants in respect of a shop room measuring 600 sq. feet at HA-3, Sector-3, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, and paying a

[Civil Appeal No. 3338 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9573 of 2007] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is against the order dated 26.03.2007 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in a contempt proceeding registered as CCC No. 669 of 2006. By the aforesaid order, the

[Civil Appeal No. 3342 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 36170 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3344 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 33677 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3345 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 35624 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3346

[Civil Appeal Nos. 3339-3340 of 2014 arising from S.L.P. (C) Nos. 13340-13341/2010] Girendra Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others [Civil Appeal No. 3341 of 2014 arising from S.L.P. (C) No. 35522/2010] KURIAN, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. Both the appeals arise from the same judgment and hence they are disposed of by

M.Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. These appeals have been filed against the common judgment and order dated 21.12.2000 passed by Delhi High Court in L.P.A. Nos. 4, 43, 139, 148 of 1987, 21 of 1988, 77 of 1993 and 86 of 1994. By the said judgment, the High Court allowed the appeals preferred by the respondents