admin

[Civil Appeal No. 5764 of 2008] N.V.RAMANA,J. 1. The appellants by way of this appeal has impugned the judgment dated 27.03.2006 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in FAO No. 441 of 2003 whereby the amount of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mandi (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in […]

[Civil Appeal No. 3334 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 15165 of 2010] A. K. PATNAIK, J. 1. Leave granted. Facts of the Case 2. The appellants have inducted the respondents as tenants in respect of a shop room measuring 600 sq. feet at HA-3, Sector-3, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, and paying a

[Civil Appeal No. 3338 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9573 of 2007] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is against the order dated 26.03.2007 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in a contempt proceeding registered as CCC No. 669 of 2006. By the aforesaid order, the

[Civil Appeal No. 3342 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 36170 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3344 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 33677 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3345 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 35624 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3346

[Civil Appeal Nos. 3339-3340 of 2014 arising from S.L.P. (C) Nos. 13340-13341/2010] Girendra Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others [Civil Appeal No. 3341 of 2014 arising from S.L.P. (C) No. 35522/2010] KURIAN, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. Both the appeals arise from the same judgment and hence they are disposed of by

M.Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. These appeals have been filed against the common judgment and order dated 21.12.2000 passed by Delhi High Court in L.P.A. Nos. 4, 43, 139, 148 of 1987, 21 of 1988, 77 of 1993 and 86 of 1994. By the said judgment, the High Court allowed the appeals preferred by the respondents

[Contempt Petition No. 147 of 2014] [Special Leave Petition(C) No.24874/2013] H.L.GOKHALE, J. 1. This contempt petition makes a grievance that the respondent-N.R.C. Ltd. has not complied with the order dated 19th August, 2013 passed by this Court while dismissing their SLP (C) No.24874 of 2013, and an action be taken against them for committing contempt

[Criminal Appeal No.597 of 2010] [Criminal Appeals No.598/2010, 599/2010, 600-602/2010, 604/2010, 605- 616/2010 and 617-627/2010] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. Enforcement of laws is as important as their enactment, especially where such laws deal with safety and security of citizens and create continuing obligations that call for constant vigil by those entrusted with their administration. Callous

[Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 892-893/2014] [Transferred Case (Civil) No. 31 of 2014 arising out of WP (C) No. 375/2014 Pending in Madras High Court] High Court of Madras by Registrar General Vs. P. Rathiram & Ors. [Transferred Case (Civil) No. 29 & 30 of 2014 arising out of TP (C) Nos. 383 & 384

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 541-542 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. 4797-4798 of 2011] CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,J. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order whereby his prayer for quashing the order taking cognizance under Section 16(1)(a) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and issuing process has been declined. Short facts giving rise to