admin

[Civil Appeal No. 3940 of 2024] Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. 1. The issue for consideration before us is whether the timeline for refund under Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 20041 must be mandatorily followed while recovering dues under the Act by adjusting them against the refund amount. 2. The brief facts relevant […]

[Criminal Appeal No._______ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1074 of 2017] [Criminal Appeal No._______ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 9482 of 2021] [Criminal Appeal No._______ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 5419 of 2022] Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. Leave granted in the above matters. 2. The concerns

[Civil Appeal No.________ of 2024 @ SLP (C) No. 5817 of 2023] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 23514 of 2023] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 27620 of 2023] Sanjay Kumar, J 1. Leave granted only in SLP (C) No. 5817 of 2023. 2. One lapse on the part of the State is all it took to generate

[Civil Appeal No. 1627 of 2016] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. This is plaintiff’s appeal arising out of a suit for possession and confirmation of his possession over the suit land which was decreed in his favour by the court of first instance but the decree was set aside in First Appeal and was affirmed by the

[Criminal Appeal No(s). 06 of 2011] Abhay S. Oka, J. 1. The appellant is the husband of the deceased, who was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’). The marriage between the appellant and the deceased was ten years old, when on 31.07.1994, the deceased

[Civil Appeal No. 1598 of 2023] Vikram Nath,J. 1. This appeal assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 23.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi in RFA No.191 of 2013 between Shakeel Ahmed and Syed Akhlaq Hussain, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the judgment and decree of the Trial Court decreeing

[Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 8674 of 2020] Aniruddha Bose, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. The present petitions have been filed by two nephews of one Mohideen Abdul Khadar, who died on 14.06.2019. He had interest in two blocks of lands, adjacent to each other

[Criminal Appeal No. 2697 of 2023] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. The appellant Anil Kumar has been convicted under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code1 by both the courts below and has been sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.50,000/, and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year under

[Criminal Appeal No. 247 of 2011] Abhay S. Oka, J. 1. This is an appeal preferred by the accused challenging the impugned judgment of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore by which the order of their acquittal, passed by the Sessions Court, was overturned. The appellants were convicted for the offences punishable under Part I

[Civil Appeal No. 9720 of 2014] Nagarathna, J. 1. This appeal has been filed assailing the judgment dated 06.07.2012, passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, in Writ Appeal No. 2458 of 2010 whereby the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 20.05.2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 12239 of 2008, remanding the