[Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 124 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 125 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 126 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 127 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 128 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 130 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 131 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 132 of 2013] KURIAN, […]
Recent SC Judgement – Inspector of Police Vs. Battenapatla Venkata Ratnam – 13.04.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.3042 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. In this appeal we are concerned with the addition in the value for assessment to customs duty of charges paid by the respondent to Met Chem Canada Inc. for supply of technical services required for setting up and commissioning a plant for the manufacture of Hot
[I.A. No. 6/2015 & I.A. No. 7/2015 in Civil Appeal No (S).226-227/2015] O R D E R I.A. NO.6 Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant does not want to press this I.A. The I.A. is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. I.A. NO.7 I.A. No.7 is allowed in terms of prayer ‘a’.
Recent SC Judgement – Swapna Sukumar Vs. State of Kerala – 10.04.15 Read More »
[CRL. M.P. Nos. 3655-3656/2015 in Criminal Appeals No(S). 1240-1241/2010] [CRL. M.P. Nos. 3653-3654/2015 in Criminal Appeals No(S). 1242-1243/2010] O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. These Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed in terms of prayer ‘a’ in these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions. Necessary corrections may be carried out accordingly. …………………………..J. [FAKKIR MOHAMED
Recent SC Judgement – Md. Jamiluddin Nasir Vs. State of West Bengal – 10.04.15 Read More »
The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday rapped the Chief Secretary and the DGP for failing to arrest even a single Gujjar agitator and allowing people to suffer due to the “undemocratic” agitation which has crippled road and rail services in the state. Asking the officials to act immediately to remove all road and rail blockades,
Gujjar agitation: HC comes down heavily on Rajasthan Chief Secy, DGP Read More »
The Supreme Court will hear on Friday an appeal by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) against the Delhi High Court order that termed as “suspect” a Centre’s notification, barring the Anti-corruption Branch (ACB) of Delhi government from acting against its officials. On Thursday, Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh mentioned the matter before the court
NEW DELHI: The tussle for power between Delhi lieutenant general Najeeb Jung and the Arvind Kejriwal government will now play out in the courts. Both sides on Thursday knocked the doors of the courts. While the Kejriwal government challenged Centre’s notification giving lieutenant governor absolute powers in appointing bureaucrats in Delhi high court, the Centre
Centre vs Delhi govt: AAP challenges MHA notification in HC, Centre moves SC Read More »
[Writ Petition (C) No.129 of 2006] O R D E R Pursuant to our order dated 06.02.2015, the Ministry of Home Affairs has filed an affidavit dated 8th April, 2015. We have heard learned counsel for the parties in considerable detail. A meeting was convened by the Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government
Recent SC Judgement – Laxmi Vs. Union of India – 10.04.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.1581 of 2009] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by special leave challenges the judgment and order dated 20.11.2007 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissing Criminal Revision No.550 of 2007 preferred by the Appellant through her natural guardian. By dismissing said criminal revision the High Court affirmed the view taken
Recent SC Judgement – Ms. Satwantin Bai Vs. Sunil Kumar – 10.04.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.566 of 2008] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by Special Leave challenges the judgment and order dated 22.08.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in DB Criminal Jail Appeal No. 27 of 2003 acquitting the Respondent herein of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with
Recent SC Judgement – State of Rajasthan Vs. Surja Ram – 10.04.15 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
