admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 1424 of 2009] [Criminal Appeal No………….of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL) No…….CRL. M.P. No. 7170 of 2007] Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. These appeals are directed against judgment and order dated 8.11.2006 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No. 1746-SB/2005 whereby the appeal of Sanjiv […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 338 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.1512 of 2015 (D .No. 5077/2015)] O R D E R Dipak Misra, J. 1. The present appeal, raises the seminal issue whether the appellants, the wife and husband, trustees of two trusts, namely, “Citizens for Justice and Peace” (CJP) and “Sabrang Trust”, should

[Civil Appeal No. 8958 of 2003] A.K.SIKRI,J. The appellant/assessee challenges the correctness and validity of the final order dated 10.10.2002 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT), New Delhi in the appeal which was preferred by the assessee against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) who had upheld the Order-in-Original dated 17.3.1999

[Civil Appeal No. 6950 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6951 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6952 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6953 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6954 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6956 of 2009] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. This group of appeals has been filed by various appellant-Associations questioning the correctness of the common impugned judgment and order dated

[Civil Appeal No. 8192 of 2003] A.K. SIKRI, J. The bare minimum facts which are required to be mentioned to decide this appeal are recapitulated, in brief, herein below: The appellant Nos. 1 and 2 are the units of Grasim Industries Limited, which carries on manufacture and sale of cement. It requires raw material in

[Civil Appeal Nos. 8617-8635 of 2003] R. F. NARIMAN, J. The present set of appeals are concerned with the validity of an explanation added retrospectively to Section 26(4) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’). On facts, the present appeals are concerned with the assessment of agricultural income received by

[Criminal Appeal No.2341 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal Nos.2342-2344 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. All these appeals are filed challenging the impugned common order dated 28.1.2011 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Misc. Nos.220 to 222 of 2011 whereby the petition filed by the appellants under Section 482 of Criminal

[Civil Appeal No.2933 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 1868 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Delay condoned. Leave granted. This appeal has been filed by the appellant being dissatisfied with the impugned Judgment and award dated 02.07.2012 passed in FAO No.1647 of 1992 (O & M) by the High Court of Punjab

[Civil Appeal Nos. 2938-2939 of 2015 Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.8972-8973 of 2014] Tata Steel Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos. 2940-2941 of 2015 Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.9016-9017 of 2014] Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 303 of 2004]

[Criminal Appeal No. 461 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.5746 of 2014] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Leave granted. The appellant is an accused in a complaint case bearing Crime No.147 of 2009 pending in the file of learned Judicial Magistrate at Gingee, Tamil Nadu. He is aggrieved