admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 454 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.9928 of 2014] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. One Vijayan @ Vijayakumar was killed on 4th June 2008 in the city of Chennai. It appears from the judgment under appeal that the incident occurred in the following manner: “At the time of occurrence,

[Civil Appeal No. 8359 of 2003] A.K. SIKRI, J. The issue involved in the present case pertains to the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment in the case of refund of duty paid on ‘capital goods’ used captively. The factual matrix under which the aforesaid issue arises for consideration is taken note of, in

[Criminal Appeal No. 442 of 2015 @ SLP (CRL.) No.1506 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 443 of 2015 @ SLP (CRL.) No.1505 of 2012] C. NAGAPPAN, J. Leave granted in both the appeals. Both the appeals are preferred against the judgment dated 14.7.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at

[Civil Appeal No. 2854 of 2015 @ Special Leave Petition (C) No.35672 of 2014] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants that the appellants are occupiers of 9 shops which have been constructed on the ground floor,

[Civil Appeal No. 2836 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 6016/2014] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of judgment in M.F.A. No.136/2009 (MV) dated 15.7.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, in and by which, the High Court modified the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims

[Civil Appeal No.7535 of 2011] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. This appeal has been preferred to assail an order dated 20th March 2009 by the High Court at Calcutta in W.P.L.R.T. No.54 of 2009. The High Court placed reliance upon a Division Bench judgment of that very Court in

[Civil Appeal No. 2835 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 20169/2013] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave arises out of the order dated 20.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in LPA No.1312 of 2012 which was dismissed in limine by the High Court,

[Civil Appeal No. 8190 of 2003] R. F. NARIMAN, J. Vide a show cause notice dated 30.08.2001 that was served upon the appellant M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Limited (then known as M/s Maruti Udyog Limited), the Department gathered, by way of intelligence, that the appellant had cleared inputs/ spares after processing, but duty was only