[Civil Appeal No. 2807 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. In the present appeal filed by the assessee, it is seeking refund of duty which was initially paid by M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘BPCL’). According to the appellant, this duty was paid by it to the BPCL on purchase of Naphtha […]
[Criminal Appeal No.520 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 5825 of 2014] Dipak Misra, J. Long back, an eminent thinker and author, Sophocles, had to say: “Law can never be enforced unless fear supports them.” Though the aforesaid statement was made centuries back, it has its pertinence, in a way, with the enormous
Recent SC Judgement – State of Punjab Vs. Saurabh Bakshi – 30.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2609 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant herein was engaged in the manufacture of certain articles from vulcanized rubber as bushes for use in the motor vehicles. Indubitably, the appellant is a Small Scale Industrial unit (hereinafter referred to as ‘SSI’ for short). The appellant has its own brand name
[Civil Appeal Nos.3211-3212 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 1668-1669 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the final judgment and order dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in M.A. No.480 of 2008, wherein the High Court
Recent SC Judgement – Asha Verman Vs. Maharaj Singh – 27.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos.3209-3210 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.7105-7106 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Delay condoned. Leave granted. These appeals have been filed by the appellant against the final judgment and order dated 23.07.2013 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 551 of 2013 in Misc. Civil Application No.3071 of 2012 in Special
The National Green Tribunal has directed Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) to take action against ceramic industries allegedly operating without consent and not adhering to mandatory pollution norms in Uttar Pradesh’s Khurja city. A bench headed by Justice U D Salvi also directed UPPCB and its regional officer to submit list of such industries
NGT orders action against ceramic units running without consent in Uttar Pradesh Read More »
Unidentified assailants on Wednesday allegedly shot another key witness in the rape case against Narayan Sai, son of self-styled ‘godman’ Asaram, in Haryana’s Panipat district. This is a sixth case of attack on a witness in rape cases against Asaram and his son Narayan Sai. The incident occurred in Sanauli village in Panipat district where
Another key witness in Narayan Sai case attacked in Haryana Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused immediate reference to an 11-judge bench the adjudication of constitutional validity of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act and said its five-judge bench would hear arguments on both the NJAC as well as reference to a larger bench. The five-judge bench of Justices J S Khehar,
Not sending NJAC case to 11-judge bench: SC Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 205 of 2009] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. This is an appeal by the Complainant against the impugned judgment and order dated 30-04-2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.1674 of 2006. In the impugned judgment the High Court had allowed the appeal of three accused
Recent SC Judgement – Ranbeer Singh (D) by LRS. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 27.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 3213 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.5840 of 2012] N.M. Ravi Vs. P.R. Yelumalai [Civil Appeal No. 3214 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.10852 of 2013] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave is granted in both the matters. 2. These cross appeals have been filed against the judgment
Recent SC Judgement – P.R. Yelumalai Vs. N.M. Ravi – 27.03.15 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
