admin

[Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 15774/2022] Aniruddha Bose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The main point which we have to address in this appeal is as to what extent the Court can take cognizance of a clause relating to purpose for which a lease is granted contained in an unregistered deed […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 1136 of 2014] Satnam Singh Vs. The Narcotics Control Bureau [Criminal Appeal No. 1933 of 2014] Hima Kohli, J. 1. The present appeals arise from the common judgment dated 08th July, 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh deciding the Murder Reference1 prepared

[Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 19401 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 19730 of 2019] B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present set of appeals challenge the common judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay

[Civil Appeal No. 6072 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 9964 of 2022] [Civil Appeal No. 6073 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 12637 of 2022] [Civil Appeal No. 6074 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 16749 of 2023] J. K. Maheshwari, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In the

[Civil Appeal Nos. 84-85 of 2016] [Civil Appeal Nos. 91-92 of 2016] [Civil Appeal Nos. 89-90 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No. 86 of 2016] [Civil Appeal Nos. 87-88 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No. 93 of 2016] 1. This batch of appeals arises from a judgment dated 21 July 2010 by a Division Bench of the

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5542 – 5543 of 2023] J. B. Pardiwala, J.: For the convenience of the exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts: 1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned appeals are same, the parties are also the same and the challenge is also to the self-same judgment and order

[Civil Appeal No. 1968 of 2012] Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. This appeal by way of special leave by Batliboi Environmental Engineers Limited1 takes exception to the judgment dated 02.11.2007, whereby the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the appeal2 filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited3 under Section 37 of the

[Criminal Appeal No. 688 of 2011] Ravinder Vs. State of NCT of Delhi [Criminal Appeal No. 689 of 2011] Shri Krishan Vs. State of NCT of Delhi [Criminal Appeal No. 785 of 2011] Manoj Misra, J. 1. These three appeals are against the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi (in short “the

[Criminal Appeal No(s). 793-794 of 2022] [Criminal Appeal No. 795 of 2022] Sanjay Kumar, J 1. Ajit Pal @ Bobby, a 15-year-old lad, was killed brutally in the last week of July, 2013. A neighbour, Om Prakash Yadav, along with his brother, Raja Yadav, and son, Rajesh @ Rakesh Yadav, stood trial in Sessions Case

[Civil Appeal No. 6070 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 20183 of 2022] Sanjay Karol J., 1. Leave granted. 2. The following questions arise for consideration of this Court: 2.1 Whether in the absence of affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties on addressing the framed substantial questions of law, the High