admin

[Criminal Appeal No.__________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 7495 of 2021] Vijay Bishnoi, J. 1. The supreme objective of law is the protection of society and creating a deterrence against crime by imposing adequate punishment. Leave Granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the Appellant challenging the Judgment dated 18.12.2020 (hereinafter referred to […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 689 of 2026 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 5624 of 2024] K. Vinod Chandran, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. A botched investigation leaves many questions unanswered and in the present case, the murder of a sixyear- old girl went unpunished and her stepfather was incarcerated on mere conjectures. The impugned judgment of the High Court

[Criminal Appeal No.__________ of 2026 @ Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 19708 of 2025] Sanjay Kumar, J 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is the complainant in FIR No. 0568 dated 29.12.2023, registered under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 18601, on the file of P.S. Risiya, District

[Civil Appeal No._________ of 2026 @ SLP (C) No. 16057 of 2025] K. Vinod Chandran, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Nepotism and self-aggrandizement are anathema to a democratic system, more so when it happens within a society comprising members of the government service, enabling housing facilities to its members by transparent allotment. The second respondent HUDA, Urban

[Civil Appeal No(s).__________ of 2026 arising out of @ SLP (C) No(s). 215-216 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No(s).__________ of 2026 @ SLP (C) No. 23949-23951/2023] [Civil Appeal No(s).__________ of 2026 @ SLP (C) No. 28469/2023] [Civil Appeal No(s).__________ of 2026 @ SLP (C) No. 3435/2025] [Civil Appeal No(s).__________ of 2026 @ SLP (C) No. 31094/2024]

[Civil Appeal No.3318 of 2023] Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order1 passed by the Commission2 in the Complaint3 filed by the respondent whereby compensation of ₹2,00,00,000/- was awarded to her on account of deficiency in service. 2. Briefly, the facts available on record are that the respondent visited

[Civil Appeal No.__________ of 2026 @ SLP (C) No. 11868 of 2024] S.V.N. Bhatti, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appeal is at the instance of the 1st and 2nd Defendants in O.S No. 197 of 2013 before the Senior Civil Judge, Kozhikode. The 1st Respondent filed OS No. 197 of 2013 for declaration, perpetual injunction, and

[Civil Appeal No. 8451 of 2011] S.V.N. Bhatti, J. 1. The Appeal arises from the judgment dated 24.07.2010 in RSA No. 221 of 1998 before the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla. 2. Sham Sunder (Since Deceased) filed Case No. 496 of 1990 before the Court of Sub Judge 1st Class, Una. The Civil Appeal is

[Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012] Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. THE CHALLENGE 1. The present Civil Appeal has been preferred by the State of West Bengal and Ors. (hereinafter referred to as “the appellants”), being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order dated 17.05.2012, passed in WPLRT No. 43 of 2010 by a Division Bench of

[Civil Appeal No.__________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (C.) No. 23880 of 2022] Dipankar Datta, J. 1. Leave granted. THE APPEAL 2. The present appeal assails the judgment and order dated 31.01.20201 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras2 in C.M.A. No. 2806 of 2013, whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the