admin

[Criminal Appeal No.600 of 2007] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1. This appeal by special leave has been preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 17th February, 2006 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Special Criminal Application No.1821 of 2005. 2. The High Court declined to interfere with the Order dated 16th August, […]

[Criminal Appeal No.456 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.6437 of 2013] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 20th February, 2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in Misc. Criminal Case No.9759 of 2012. 3. The

[Criminal Misc. Petition No.17870 of 2014 in Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.2838 of 2000] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This application has been filed under Section 7-A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short “the Act”) seeking release of the petitioner who has been found to be juvenile. Since

[Criminal Appeal No. 454 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.9928 of 2014] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. One Vijayan @ Vijayakumar was killed on 4th June 2008 in the city of Chennai. It appears from the judgment under appeal that the incident occurred in the following manner: “At the time of occurrence,

[Civil Appeal No. 8359 of 2003] A.K. SIKRI, J. The issue involved in the present case pertains to the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment in the case of refund of duty paid on ‘capital goods’ used captively. The factual matrix under which the aforesaid issue arises for consideration is taken note of, in

[Criminal Appeal No. 442 of 2015 @ SLP (CRL.) No.1506 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 443 of 2015 @ SLP (CRL.) No.1505 of 2012] C. NAGAPPAN, J. Leave granted in both the appeals. Both the appeals are preferred against the judgment dated 14.7.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at

[Civil Appeal No. 2854 of 2015 @ Special Leave Petition (C) No.35672 of 2014] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants that the appellants are occupiers of 9 shops which have been constructed on the ground floor,

[Civil Appeal No. 2836 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 6016/2014] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of judgment in M.F.A. No.136/2009 (MV) dated 15.7.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, in and by which, the High Court modified the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims