admin

[Interlocutory Application No. 25652 of 2026] [Criminal Appeal No. 1425 of 2025] 1. Heard Ms. Aparna Bhat, the learned Amicus Curiae and Mr. K.M. Nataraj, the learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India. 2. By this application the following has been prayed for:- “a) Direct the appointment of Dr. T.C.A. Anant, former Chief […]

[Miscellaneous Application No. 196 of 2026] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1405 of 2023] 1. By this Miscellaneous Application, Ms. Jayna Kothari, the learned Amicus Curiae has prayed for the following:- “Kindly allow the present application filed by the Amicus Curiae and pass appropriate directions to include Ms. Aparna Mehrotra, Senior Associate, Centre for Law and

[Civil Appeal Nos. 13749-13755 of 2024] Nagarathna, J. 1. The producer and distributor of groundnut seeds, namely, M/s. Shyam Beej Bhandar and Shree Ram Agro Bio-Tech (“appellants”, for short) respectively have filed these appeals assailing the order dated 19.03.2021 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (“NCDRC”, for short) in Revision Petition

[Criminal Appeal No._________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 18886/2025] Leave granted. The appellant, Reginamary Chellamani, is aggrieved by the denial of regular bail by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, vide order dated 24.07.2025 passed in Crl.O.P. No. 7857/2025, in relation to Case R.R. No. 41/2021 (C.C. No. 225/2022 on the

[Civil Appeal No(s).__________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 36106 of 2025] Civil Appeal No(s).__________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 36057 of 2025] Mehta, J. 1. Heard. 2. Leave granted. 3. At the outset, it is apposite to note that Shri Neeraj Kishan Kaul, learned senior counsel representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, namely,

[Civil Appeal No(s). 2129-2130 of 2012] Satish Chandra Sharma, J. FACTUAL MATRIX 1. The present Civil Appeals arise out of a long-drawn family dispute concerning partition, and alienation of agricultural properties situated primarily in and around Perambalur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. The dispute pertain to 79 items of immovable properties, all of which are set out

[Criminal Appeal No._________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4452 of 2025] Nagarathna, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of order dated 03.03.2025 passed by the High Court for the State of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in WPCR No.117/2025 dismissing the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India

[Civil Appeal Nos._________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 22628-22630 of 2022] [Contempt Petition No(S)._________ of 2026 arising out of Diary No(s). 35252 of 2025] [Contempt Petition No(S)._________ of 2026 arising out of @ Diary No(s). 39626 of 2025] [Contempt Petition No(S).__________ of 2026 arising out of @ Diary No(s). 41566 of 2025]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 23525 – 23526 of 2017] J.B. Pardiwala, J. 1. Since the issues involved in both the captioned appeals are the same, the challenge is also to the self-same judgment passed by the Tribunal and the parties are also the same, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by

[Civil Appeal No._________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 10686 of 2020] [Civil Appeal No._________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 12937 of 2021] Satish Chandra Sharma, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeals arising out of the final judgment and order dated 19.02.2020 passed by the Division Bench of