[Civil Appeal No 3483 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. The appellant-husband in this civil appeal has assailed the judgment dated 24.11.2008 passed by the High Court of Calcutta Circuit Bench at Port Blair in F.A. No.003 of 2008, wherein the Division Bench of the High Court set aside the decree of divorce dated 14.7.2008 granted […]
Recent SC Judgement – Ramchander Vs. Ananta – 24.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 11208 of 2011] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the impugned order dated 3rd December, 2010 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh, Bench at Chandimandir in OA No.837/2010 whereby the tribunal allowed the Respondent’s application for grant of disability pension. 2. The undisputed facts of the case are
Recent SC Judgement – Union of India Vs. Angad Singh Titaria – 24.02.15 Read More »
NEW DELHI: Orders passed by foreign courts on matrimonial disputes involving Indian origin couples should be respected by Indian courts, the Supreme Court has said in a ruling which has implication for cases where relief is sought in India after one of the parties flies back to the country. While adjudicating on a child custody
Must respect foreign courts’ orders on PIO couples: SC Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.4942 of 2007] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This civil appeal is filed by the appellant/plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “the plaintiff) against the judgment/order dated 03.03.2005 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Revision No. 3127 of 2004 which arises out of order dated 26.03.2004 passed
Recent SC Judgement – Om Aggarwal Vs. Haryana Financial Corporation – 23.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2080 of 2015 arising from S.L.P. (C) No. 26218/2014] KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. Election to the Amravati Municipal Corporation was held on 16.02.2012. Of the total 87 Councillors, the Nationalist Congress Party with 17, Muslim League with 2, R.P.I. with 1, Samajwadi Party with 1 and 2 Independents formed an aghadi (group)
Recent SC Judgement – Sunil Haribhau Kale Vs. Avinash Gulabrao Mardikar – 20.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2079 of 2015 arising from S.L.P. (C) No. 20140/2014] KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. Once an application is duly filed in terms of Section 8 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Arbitration Act’) before the civil court, what should be the approach of the court, is the short
Recent SC Judgement – M/s. Sundaram Finance Ltd. Vs. T. Thankam – 20.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2077 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 8675 of 2014] M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The short question that falls for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the Bombay High Court has correctly decided the jurisdiction of a Court to entertain application under Section 34
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said the right to maintenance of a wife was absolute and no exceptions could be made, ruling that Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which embodies this rule, would apply to divorced Muslim women as well. “If the husband is healthy, able-bodied and is in a
The Supreme Court on Tuesday referred to Constitution Bench a batch of petitions challenging the validity of a constitutional amendment and the NJAC Act, meant to scrap the collegium system of appointing judges. A three-judge bench led by Justice Anil R Dave said that all the issues relating to the challenge to Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment)
Supreme Court refers pleas challenging validity of NJAC to constitution bench Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2061 of 2015 @ Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21297 of 2014] Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 1.5.2014, passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No. 428 of 2014 whereby the Division Bench declined to
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
