admin

[Civil Appeal No. 836 of 2018] [Civil Appeal No. 3369 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No(S). 2256 of 2018] [Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). _______ of 2023 @ SLP (C) Diary No(S). 4647 of 2018] [Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). 11204 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023 […]

[Civil Appeal No(S). 10069 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No(S). 5005-5007 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). 2737 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). 5400 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). 26756 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No(S). 3881-3882 of 2019] Nagarathna,

[Civil Appeal No. 2768 of 2023] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The appellant, who is the original plaintiff has preferred this appeal for challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 23rd June 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench). By the impugned judgment, the

[Civil Appeal No. 2552/2022] Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment of NCLAT dated 01.12.2021 on a limited aspect. It is not necessary for us to delve into all the factual scenario which gave rise to these proceedings. Suffice to say that there is no controversy before us

[Civil Appeal Nos. 1538-1539 of 2008] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 358 of 2011] Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI 1. The appeals1 arise from a judgment and order dated 15 October 2003 of a Division Bench at the Jaipur Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan. In addition, there is a writ petition2 under

[Civil Appeal No. 841 of 2018] [SLP(C) No. 10918/2018] [SLP(C) No. 9604/2018] [SLP(C) No. 9613/2018] [Diary No(s). 24834/2018] [Diary No(s). 25256/2018] [SLP(C) No. 24671/2018] [Diary No(s). 32753/2018] [Diary No(s). 32756/2018] [Diary No(s). 37055/2018] [Diary No(s). 39059/2018] [SLP(C) No. 426/2019] [SLP(C) No. 505-506/2019] [SLP(C) No. 17506/2018] [Diary No(s). 23638/2018] [Diary No(s). 24137/2018] [Diary No(s). 24530/2018] [Diary

[Criminal Appeal No. 1255 of 1999] [Criminal Appeal No. 1256 of 1999] [Criminal Appeal No. 1367 of 1999] [Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 47 of 2011] [Writ Petition (C) No. 316 of 2008] [TC (C) No. 27 of 2011] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 316 of 2008] 1. This batch of cases raises two significant issues: (i)

[Criminal Appeal No. 1012 of 2022] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The occurrence based on which the appellant was convicted was of 7th November 2003. According to the prosecution case, around 10 a.m. on that day, about 1,000 to 1,500 people had gathered in the Shah Alam area of the city of Ahmedabad. When

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 2069-2070 of 2022] Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. 1. These appeals would call in question the legality and validity of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.08.2022 and 05.09.2022 passed by the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok in Criminal Appeal No. 08 of 2020 whereby the High Court has

[Civil Appeal No._________ of 2023 arising out of Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No._________ @ Diary No. 29700 of 2019] Aniruddha Bose, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. The main question which arises for adjudication in this appeal is as to whether the Registrar of Society, empowered to grant registration under West Bengal Registration