NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday gave Sahara group three months to submit final proposal to raise funds to repay investors’ money raised by the company in 2008 and 2009. The apex court allowed Sahara to sell part of Aamby Valley township near Mumbai to raise funds The SC also gave permission to US-based […]
Supreme Court gives Sahara three months to raise funds Read More »
“Sting has lost the venom, this is how the present case can be described.” These were the first remarks made by a Delhi court while discharging 32 officials of the Sales Tax department facing corruption charges due to a sting operation. The court discharged all the accused under sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act,
Court says ‘sting has lost venom’, acquits 32 officials of graft charges Read More »
BENGALURU: The Karnataka high court on Sunday ordered the CID not to make or publish any interim report on its inquiry into the mysterious death of IAS officer D K Ravi. Hearing a writ petition at his residence, Justice S Abdul Nazeer said in his interim order: “The respondents are restrained from making or publishing
DK Ravi case: Court restrains CID from preparing interim report Read More »
NEW DELHI: For a second time in the past week, Union minister Maneka Gandhi has come out with a view contradictory to that of her government. Expressing opposition to the proposed amendments to the anti-dowry Act, Maneka said the legislation was women-friendly and should remain unchanged. TOI had reported that the ministry of home affairs
Maneka against dilution of anti-dowry law Read More »
[Writ Petition (C) No.252 of 2004] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This petition has been filed as public interest litigation on the issue of protection of historical objects preserved at different places in the country particularly in various museums. Prayer in the petition is for a direction for adequate security arrangements and for proper investigation
Recent SC Judgement – Subhas Datta Vs. Union of India – 03.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.1415 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.4969/2014] R. BANUMATI, J. Delay condoned. 1. Leave granted. 2. Being dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the High Court of Gujarat in First Appeal No. 4021 of 1998 dated 16.1.2012, the claimants have filed this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation on account
Recent SC Judgement – Jitendra Khimshankar Trivedi Vs. Kasam Daud Kumbhar – 03.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 1733 of 2015 Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.7445 of 2012] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel. 3. The short question with which we are concerned in this case is whether the appellants, who are legal heirs of the original allottee of a shop,
[Civil Appeal No. 1389 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.33509/2011] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This civil appeal is filed by the unsuccessful writ petitioners against the judgment and order dated 17.06.2011 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in L.P.A. No. 447 of 2009 which arises out
[Criminal Appeal No. 175 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.8715/2014] [Criminal Appeal Nos.166-167 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) Nos.10109-10110/2014] [Criminal Appeal Nos.164-165 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) Nos.9524-9525/2014] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. These appeals are filed by the accused persons against the judgment and order dated 03.02.2014 passed
Recent SC Judgement – Balu S/o. Onkar Pund Vs. State of Maharashtra – 02.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 3137 of 2010] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. The Appellant has by the pulpit of this Civil Appeal assailed the Judgment and final Order dated 13.3.2007 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh (Hyderabad) in CMA No. 1986 of 2003, rendered in the matter of Syed Abdul Saleem v. The
Recent SC Judgement – Defence Estate Officer Vs. Syed Abdul Saleem – 02.02.15 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
