Dealing with the issue of sedition and freedom of speech, the Bombay High Court in an order passed Tuesday said the charge cannot be invoked whenever the government is criticised unless such censure leads to violent public disorder. The issue was raised before Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice N M Jamdar during the hearing […]
Bombay HC: Citizens have right to criticise govt Read More »
Scrapping the Centre’s March 2014 notification to include Jats in the central list of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category in nine states, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that “caste” and “historical injustice” cannot blind a state in according backward status to a community and that new emerging groups such as transgenders must be identified
[Civil Appeal No.2731 of 2005] [C.A.No. 1310 of 2006] [C.A.No. 1318 of 2015 @ SLP (C) No.16404 of 2006] [C.A.No. 1319 of 2015 @ SLP (C) No.5838 of 2008] 1. Leave granted in SLP (C) No.16404 of 2006 and SLP(C) No.5838 of 2008. 2. The Government of Uttar Pradesh acquired land in various districts and
[Criminal Appeal No. 192 of 2015 S.L.P (CRL.) No.9835 of 2014] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal is filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment and order dated 22.05.2014 passed by the High Court of Kerala, at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal No.108 of 2001, whereby the High Court has partly allowed the appeal
Recent SC Judgement – C. Sukumaran Vs. State of Kerala – 29.01.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.73 of 2007] Shri G. Kamalakar Vs. M/S Surana Securities Ltd. & ANR. [Criminal Appeal No.73 of 2007] Shri G. Kamalakar Vs. M/S Surana Securities Ltd. & ANR. [Criminal Appeal No.1437 of 2013] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. As the question of law involved is common in both the appeals, they are heard
Recent SC Judgement – A.C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra – 28.01.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 92/2015] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 19.8.2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.181 SB of 2000, whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the appellants thereby confirming the conviction of the appellants with certain modifications.
Recent SC Judgement – Jage Ram Vs. State of Haryana – 28.01.15 Read More »
A Pakistani court on Tuesday adjourned the hearing of the government’s plea for cancellation of bail to Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the 2008 Mumbai attack mastermind, till March 26 as his counsel did not turn up. “The Islamabad High Court today adjourned the hearing till March 26 as Lakhvi’s counsel did not turn up. His counsel
Pak court adjourns hearing on plea for cancelling Lakhvi bail Read More »
The Supreme Court on Tuesday quashed a decision to include Jats in the central list of Other Backward Classes (OBC) category in nine states for providing reservation benefits. The notification included Jat community in OBC list in Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Rajasthan (two districts of Bharatpur and Dholpur), Uttar Pradesh and
SC quashes decision to include Jats in OBC category, says caste can’t be sole ground Read More »
A Myanmar court has sentenced a New Zealand bar manager and his business associates to two years and six months in prison for insulting Buddhism over a flyer that showed a psychedelic depiction of Buddha wearing headphones. Blackwood, 32, Tun Thurein and Htut Ko Ko Lwin were given two years of hard labor for insulting
Myanmar court jails New Zealand man for insulting Buddha Read More »
[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 901 of 2014] [Writ Petition (C) No. 902 of 2014] [Writ Petition (C) No. 903 of 2014] [Writ Petition (C) No. 904 of 2014] [Writ Petition (C) No. 905 of 2014] [Writ Petition (C) No. 907 of 2014] [Writ Petition (C) No. 925 of 2014] [Writ Petition (C) No. 926 of
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
