admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 2282 of 2014] PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 30.6.2014 passed by High Court of Gujarat whereby the said Court has partly allowed the criminal appeals arisen out of Sessions Case No. 85 of 2003 and the cross Sessions Case No. 53 of 2004, which

[Civil Appeal No. 1086 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.19426 of 2012] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. The appellant whose land bearing CTS Nos. 31(pt), 7 (pt), 70 to 78, 80(pt) and 81, measuring 2188 sq. mtrs. at Vikhroli were reserved in the Development Plan in the year 1991 for acquisition by the

[Civil Appeal No. 1087 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 22784 of 2014] O R D E R V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and final order dated 24.07.2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in L.P.A. No.3 of 2013, whereby

[Civil Appeal No. 1094 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.9059 of 2013] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 19th October, 2012 passed by the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.52578 of 2004. 3. The question

Appointment – Enquiry officer – Charge sheet- Quashing of – Certificate of petitioner regarding Diploma course of Sanitary Inspector found to be bogus – Institute from where diploma had been obtained by the petitioner was neither a university or even deemed university and rather was a fake institution functioning in violation of the university Grants

Appointment – Category of treeorist affected persons – On the date when the case of petitioner was being considered for appoinment, certificate showing petitoner to 100% disabled – Subsequent reduction of his disability will not affect his right to get post – Respondent are directed to consider the case of petitioner for appointment in terms

Annual Confidential Report – Below benchmark grade – Non-communication of ACR – In the ACR for the year 2003-04 respondent had been graded ‘Good’ a grade which was below the prescribed benchmark of ‘Very Good’ – The said below benchmark ACR grading was communicated to be the respondent on May 12, 2010 in wake of