admin

[Civil Appeal No(s).__________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 30936 of 2025] Vikram Nath, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by the final order passed by the Delhi High Court in RFA (OS) No. 12/2021 dated 03.09.2025 whereby the Court has set aside the decree of specific performance granted in […]

[Civil Appeal No._________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (C) No. 15218 of 2024] Vikram Nath, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by the final judgment and order dated 22.03.2022 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad in CMA No. 98 of 2010 whereby the High Court

[Civil Appeal No. 7661 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 12552 of 2025 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 36434 of 2014] Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. 1. Leave granted in SLP (Civil) No.36434 of 2014. FACTUAL MATRIX IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7661 OF 2014 2. Civil Appeal No.7661 of 2014 calls in question the impugned order dated 22.01.2013

[Civil Appeal No.__________ of 2025 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 21917 of 2025] Aravind Kumar, J. 1. Heard. Leave Granted. 2. The present controversy can be encapsulated in words of the Hon’ble Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer: “Procedural law is not to be a tyrant but a servant, not an obstruction but an aid to justice. It

[Civil Appeal No._________ of 2025 @ SLP (C) No. 19549 of 2024] Aravind Kumar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.05.2024 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur, in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3451 of 2023. By the said order, the

[Civil Appeal No. 3051 of 2015] Aravind Kumar, J. 1. This appeal, is directed against the judgment and final order dated 21.12.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No. 303 of 2011 affirming the judgment dated 13.07.2010 rendered by the Single Judge in Writ Petition No.

[Criminal Appeal No(s)._________ of 2025 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No (s). 2797-2798 of 2025] [Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No(s). 3308-3309 of 2025] [Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No(s). 3310-3311 of 2025] Mehta, J. Criminal Appeal @ SLP(Crl.) No(s). 2797-2798 of 2025 1. Heard. 2. Leave granted. 3. The State of Rajasthan is in appeal before us for assailing

[Civil Appeal Nos. 12442-12446 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos. 12449-12451 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos. 12460-12462 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos. 12463-12464 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos. 12455-12457 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos. 12465-12467 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos. 12458-12459 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos. 12447-12448 of 2024] [Civil Appeal Nos. 12452-12454 of 2024] K.

[Criminal Appeal No. 1187 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 740 of 2014] Sattar & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar [Criminal Appeal No. 1188 of 2014 SLP (Crl.) No. 726 of 2014] J.B. Pardiwala, J. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:- Index I. CASE OF THE

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 541-543 of 2015] Neelakantappa Vs. State of Karnataka Etc. [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1509-1510 of 2015] Vikram Nath, J. 1. Sixteen (16) accused were put to trial for the charges of unlawful assembly and culpable homicide amounting to murder of one Mohan Kumar (deceased) and for the charges of causing grievous hurt and