[Criminal Appeal No. 2587 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 8469 of 2014] Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted. The present appeal, by special leave, calls in question the legal substantiality and defensibility of the order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31078 […]
Recent SC Judgement – Neeru Yadav Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh –16.12.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 5838 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 5839 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 11197 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.3202 of 2014] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. What should be the right balance between equitable claims and the demands of the law is the constant quest of the judicial system. Delicate and
Recent SC Judgement – K.K. Sharma Vs. High Court of Delhi –15.12.14 Read More »
[Writ Petition (Criminal) No.128 of 2014] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India prays that the sentence of death imposed upon the present petitioner be commuted to the imprisonment for life for the reasons dealt with in detail hereafter. 2. In Sessions Trial No.67 of 2005, the
Recent SC Judgement – Ajay Kumar Pal Vs. Union of India –12.12.14 Read More »
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Wednesday extended till February 17 its interim relief to troubled Avadhnama editor Shirin Dalvi from coercive steps, including arrest, by the state. A division bench of Justice Ranjit More and Justice Anuja Prabhudessai was to hear a plea by Dalvi to club and quash multiple first information reports filed
Bombay high court extends relief to editor in Prophet’s cartoon row Read More »
Taking a serious view of a probe in a rape case being transferred from Agra to Firozabad without any concrete reason, and on the request of the accused’s brother, the Allahabad High Court on Wednesday asked the Uttar Pradesh government about the basis on which the case was transferred. The court, which will hear the
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on was questioned by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) for the second time in last four weeks in connection with the mysterious death of his wife Sunanda Pushkar. Tharoor was quizzed at the SIT office in Vasant Vihar in south Delhi on various aspects leading to Sunanda’s death. This is the
Sunanda Pushkar murder case: Tharoor quizzed for the second time Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.162 of 2012] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 27.07.2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.1057 of 2005 setting aside the judgment of acquittal passed by the Special Judge at Mysore in Special Case No.95 of 1995 and
Recent SC Judgement – S. Dinesh Kumar Vs. State through Inspector –12.12.14 Read More »
[Writ Petition (C) No. 223 of 2009] [C.A. No. 11037 of 2014 @ SLP (C) No. 276/2007] [C.A. No. 11038 of 2014 @ SLP (C) No. 852/2007] [C.A. No. 11039 of 2014 @ SLP (C) No. 11880/2009] Dipak Misra, J. 1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions. 2. The present batch of appeals
Recent SC Judgement – M/s. Nova Ads Vs. Metropolitan Transport Corporation –12.12.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 2569 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.6752 of 2014] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave has been preferred against the final judgment and order dated 28th October, 2013 of the High Court of Chattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No.1788 of 1997. 3.
[Civil Appeal Nos. 662-663 of 2008] 1. Leave granted 2. These civil appeals arise out of common judgment dated 06.05.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Guwahati in W.A. No. 512 of 2002, which in turn, arises out of judgment dated 26.02.2001 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.
Recent SC Judgement – Sri Prabin Ram Phukan Vs. State of Assam –11.12.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
