admin

[Civil Appeal No(s)._________ of 2025 arising out of SLP (C) No. 26593 of 2025] Vikram Nath, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Some litigants, it seems, cannot take yes for an answer. After this Court on 1st April, 2025 set aside the decree but moulded equitable relief by directing payment of ₹2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores), a […]

[Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19767 of 2025] J.B. Pardiwala J., For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:- Index A. FACTUAL MATRIX ………… B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS ….. C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT …… D. REJOINDER TO THE SUBMISSIONS CANVASSED ON

[Civil Appeal No. 703 of 2012 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 15476/2011] [Civil Appeal No. 705 of 2012 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 15478/2011] J.B. Pardiwala, J. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: Index A. FACTUAL MATRIX ….. 2 B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PARTIES

[Criminal Appeal No. 1471 of 2013] K.V. Viswanathan, J. 1. Nilesh Baburao Gitte (the appellant) stands convicted for matricide-killing of one’s own mother. By the present appeal, the appellant calls in question the correctness of the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Appeal No.447 of 2012 dated 23.07.2013.

[Civil Appeal No._________ of 2025 @ SLP (C) No. 16996 of 2022] S.V.N. Bhatti, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The Civil Appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 06.07.2022 in RFA No. 200204 of 2019 in the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, Kalaburagi. The Civil Appeal is at the instance of the Defendants in OS

[Civil Appeal No.________ of 2025 @ SLP (C) No. 1420 of 2024] N.V. Anjaria, J. 1. Leave granted. 1.1 Heard learned Senor Advocate Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan for the appellant, learned Solicitor General Mr. Tushar Mehta for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 8, learned Additional Solicitor General Ms. Aishwarya Bhati for respondent Nos.8 and 9, learned Senior

[Civil Appeal No. 11342 of 2013] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. One Mahadevappa, son of Waderahalli Basappa of Village Shamanur was the owner of sites measuring 42 ft. x 30 ft. and 41 ½ ft. x 30 ft., which were carved out of Survey Nos. 113/2 and 114/1. These revenue sites were described as plots Nos. 56

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 476-477 of 2013] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. All the three appellants, father, son and son-in-law are accused in Session Trial No.215 of 2000 for the murder of Pushpendra Singh, son of Diler Singh. 2. They were acquitted by the Trial Court but have been convicted under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (for short,

[Civil Appeal Nos._________ of 2025 arising out of SLP (C) No. 22105-22106 of 2024] Augustine George Masih, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant Civil Appeals assail the Judgment and Order dated 10.04.2024 passed in Review Petition No. 76 of 2024 and Judgment and Order dated 19.12.2023 passed in Arbitration Case No. 23 of 2022

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 4183-4184 of 2025 arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 7828-7829 of 2022] Augustine George Masih, J. 1. Two writ petitions were preferred by the Appellants herein before the High Court of Karnataka, with the Appellant No. 1, JSW Steel Limited (hereinafter “JSW”), being common in both the petitions, whereas Appellant No. 2,