admin

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 2628-2629 of 2023 @ SLP (Crl.) Nos. 8506-8507/2022] 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. The two appeals arise out of the orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Application No.14899/2022 filed by the respondents-accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal […]

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 2643-2644 of 2023 arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) Nos. 6854-6855 of 2023] Abhay S.Oka, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent-State. 3. The present appellant-Niranjan Das was Accused No.2 before the Trial Court. He was convicted by the

[Special Leave Petition (C) No. 31526 of 2017] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. Shri Parthiv K. Goswami, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Shri Tanmaya Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondents were heard on merits. 2. Under challenge is the judgment and order dated 04.09.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court whereby

[Civil Appeal No. 3423 of 2017 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 33070/2013] KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. The appellant (hereinafter referred to as “the Management”) is aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the High Court whereby the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as “the employee”) was directed to be reinstated in service with 50 per

[Civil Appeal No.6549 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos.6550, 6551, 6552, 6553, 6554, 6555, 6556-6561 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos.4327, 4328, 4329, 4330, 4331 and 4332 of 2015 @ SLP (C) Nos.29275, 29267, 34936, 35196, 34882 of 2014 and SLP (C) No.2623 Of 2015] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.1057 of 2014] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J: Leave granted

[Criminal Appeal No. 89 of 2009] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by Special Leave challenges the judgment and order dated 25.04.2006 of the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Appeal No.27 of 2001 setting aside the judgment and order of conviction dated 29.12.2000 of the Special Judge for

[Civil Appeal Nos.1527-1536 of 2013] [Civil Appeal Nos.1557-1566/2013, 1577-1586/2013, 1597-1606/2013, 1537- 1546/2013, 1547-1556/2013, 1567-1576/2013, 1587-1596/2013, 1607-1608/2013, 1609-1610/2013, 1611-1612/2013, 1613-1614/2013, 1615-1616/2013, 1617- 1618/2013, 1619-1620/2013, 1621-1622/2013, 1623-1624/2013, 1625-1626/2013, 1627-1628/2013, 1629-1630/2013, 1631-1632/2013, 1633-1634/2013] [CA Nos.4183-4192/2015 @ SLP (C) Nos. 21344-21353/2013] ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. Leave granted in SLP [C] Nos.21344-21353/2015. 2. The appeals arise out of a common

[Civil Appeal No.4367 of 2004] O R D E R On being mentioned learned senior counsel has pointed out the typographical error in para 53 of the judgment where the remand is to be to jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals) instead of CESTAT. The error is corrected accordingly. …………….J. (A.K. Sikri) …………….J. (R.F. Nariman) New Delhi; April

[Civil Appeal No. 7642 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant herein is the manufacturer of Tyre Cord Yarn (TCY) and Tyre Cord Fabric (TCB) falling under Chapter 54 and 59 of the Central Excise Tariff Act respectively. The aforesaid goods TCY and TCB are manufactured by the appellant at its Goregaon factory. The

[Civil Appeal No. 5768 of 2006] P. Sreenivasulu Naidu Vs. Special Deputy Collector, Tirupathi & ANR.] [Civil Appeal No. 5769 of 2006] R.N. Rangamma Vs. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams & ANR.] [Civil Appeal No. 5770 of 2006] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. These appeals are filed against the common judgment and order dated 05.07.2004 passed by