[Civil Appeal No. 3148 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 3147 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 3149 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 1390 of 2013] [S.L.P. (C) No. 19895 of 2008] [S.L.P. (C) No. 20282 of 2008] [S.L.P. (C) No. 21896 of 2010] [S.L.P. (C) No. 18614 of 2012] H.L. Dattu, CJI. 1. In view of […]
[Civil Appeal No. 10531 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.14767 of 2012] R.F.Nariman,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant herein was awarded a certain construction work contract by the DDA vide a letter of award dated 14th May, 1992. DDA was building a colony consisting of 7,000 houses in Trilok Puri in the
Recent SC Judgement – Associate Builders Vs. Delhi Development Authority – 25.11.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 10532 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 5346 of 2012] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 05.07.2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Writ Petition No. 9710 of 2003 dismissing the
Recent SC Judgement – Sita Ram Vs. State of Haryana – 25.11.14 Read More »
PORT-AU-PRINCE: Haiti on Friday installed a Provisional Electoral Council in a key step toward averting a constitutional crisis after weeks of protests and political uncertainty. The swearing in of the nine-member council representing different sectors of society took place at the Supreme Court shortly before a United Nations Security Council mission was due to arrive
Haiti picks election council to get back on democratic path Read More »
NEW DELHI: CBI on Friday registered a fresh case in the coal block allocation scam against unknown government officials and Indal (Indian Aluminium Company), now Hindalco, for alleged irregularities in the use of coal from Talabira-I coal block. The company was allocated the block in 1994. The agency had last year closed its previous case
CBI registers case in Talabira-I coal block allocation Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 10529 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.11696 of 2007] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 7th May, 2007 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Civil Side in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.47201 of 2002. 3.
Recent SC Judgement – Sri Sidhharth Viyas Vs. Ravi Nath Misra – 25.11.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1097/2012] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This appeal arises out of judgment dated 29.12.2011 passed by High Court of Uttarakhand in Criminal Appeal No.215/2002, in and by which, the High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellants under Sections 304B, 498A and 201 IPC and the sentence of life imprisonment imposed on each
Recent SC Judgement – Jagdish Vs. State of Uttaranchal – 25.11.14 Read More »
[I.A. No. 7 of 2014 in Civil Appeal No.7148 of 2008] O R D E R V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This Interlocutory Application is filed by the applicant-respondent for modifying the operative part of the final judgment and order dated 13.11.2013 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 7148 of 2008 directing the appellants
Recent SC Judgement – Calcutta Port Trust Vs. Anadi Kumar Das (Capt) – 24.11.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 10304 of 2014] C. NAGAPPAN, J. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and final Order dated 30.8.2013 passed by the High Court Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Special Civil Application No.15449 of 2008. The respondent was working as a Judicial Officer under the administrative control of the High Court namely the appellant
Recent SC Judgement – High Court of Gujarat Vs. Hitendra Vrajlal Ashara – 24.11.14 Read More »
NEW DELHI: Congress on Wednesday made it clear that the party is unhappy with its senior leader Kapil Sibal for representing the West Bengal government in the Saradha chit fund scam case in the Supreme Court, two days after its state unit revolted against the move and complained to the party high command about its
Congress ‘unhappy’ with Kapil Sibal for taking up Mamata govt’s case in Saradha scam Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
