admin

[Criminal Appeal Nos . 701-702 /2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) Nos.5767-5768/2013] Raj Kumar Vs. Mahabir & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 703 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.6347/2013] Bharat Singh Vs. Rishi Pal & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 704 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.10739/2013] R. BANUMATHI J. 1. Leave granted. […]

[Civil Appeal No.6709 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. The facts of the present case reveal that the appellant started manufacturing duplicate CDs from a master tape/CD issued to them by a distributor who had copyright in the contents of the CD. The following chain will show exactly how the present transaction of job work

[Civil Appeal No.4367 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows. The appellant is engaged in ship breaking activity at Alang Ship Breaking Yard. The appellant imported a vessel, namely, M.V. Olinda, for the purpose of breaking the same, and filed a Bill of Entry when

[Civil Appeal No. 5541 of 2004] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Respondent is the holder of Central Excise Registration for manufacture of RCC and PSC pipes falling under Chapter Heading 6804/6807 for the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondent entered into four agreements for designing, manufacturing, providing at site, laying, jointing

[Civil Appeal No. 1906 of 2007] H.L. DATTU, CJI. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in TRC No. 412 of 2002 and Sales Tax Revision Nos. 321 and 326 of 2005, dated 23.12.2005, whereby and whereunder, the High Court has held that the

[Criminal Appeal No. 682 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.458 of 2013] R. BANUMATHI, J. Delay condoned. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 10.12.2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.777-SB of 1996, whereby the High Court affirmed the

[Civil Appeal Nos. 3725-3726 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 3377-3378 of2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. Leave granted. These appeals are preferred against judgment dated 8.9.2010 in R.S.A. No.1500 of 2009 by which the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore allowed the Second Appeal filed by the respondent herein and against the

[Civil Appeal No. 3727 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 5532 of 2012] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. The appellant-Corporation has questioned the correctness of the judgment and order dated 11.08.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby the High Court dismissed the Writ Appeal No. 1006 of 2011

[Criminal Appeal No.1797 of 2012] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. The appellants stand convicted under Sections 498A, 306 and 304B of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC”) and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment (“RI”) for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.5000/-. In default, to undergo further imprisonment for two years. They also stand sentenced