Law Intellect India

admin

Anilkumar @ Lapetu Ramshakal Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

[Criminal Appeal No.__________ of 2025 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 8539 of 2025] K. Vinod Chandran, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant, a life convict, is seeking pre-mature release after almost 20 years of incarceration. The appellant approached the Government for remission of his life sentence upon which the Government procured a report from the

Anilkumar @ Lapetu Ramshakal Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Read More »

Kalyani Transco Vs. M/s. Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. and Ors.

[Civil Appeal No. 1808 of 2020] [Civil Appeal Nos. 2192-2193 of 2020] [Civil Appeal No. 2225 of 2020] [Civil Appeal No. 3020 of 2020] [Civil Appeal No. 6390 of 2021] Index I. INTRODUCTION…………. 4 II. FACTS ………. 4 III. SUBMISSIONS ……….. 15 i. Appellants in Civil Appeal Nos. 2192 – 2193 of 2020 (erstwhile promoters)

Kalyani Transco Vs. M/s. Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. and Ors. Read More »

SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation Vs. GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd.

[Civil Appeal No._________ of 2025 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2706 of 2024] Augustine George Masih, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant Civil Appeal, arising from Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 2706 of 2024, assails the Judgment dated 27.09.2023 in ARBA (ICA) No. 1 of 2023 (hereinafter, “Impugned Judgment”) by Division Bench of

SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation Vs. GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. Read More »

Competition Commission of India Vs. Kerala Film Exhibitors Federation & Ors.

[Civil Appeal No. 9726 of 2016] K.V. Viswanathan, J. A. BRIEF FACTS ………….. 3 B. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL……. 5 C. NOTICE TO PARTIES BY THE COMMISSION ……. 6 D. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE COMMISSION AND ORDER …….. 6 E. APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS ………… 12 F. CONTENTIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL ……. 15 G. QUESTION FOR CONSIDERATION ………..

Competition Commission of India Vs. Kerala Film Exhibitors Federation & Ors. Read More »

Dhannalal alias Dhanraj (D) through LRS. Vs. Nasir Khan and Ors.

[Civil Appeal No. 2159 of 2024] K. Vinod Chandran, J. 1. The original claimant, the injured in a motor accident, had filed the above appeal, seeking enhancement of compensation as awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal1 and enhanced by the High Court. The claimant who was rendered 100% disabled, by reason of the accident, unfortunately

Dhannalal alias Dhanraj (D) through LRS. Vs. Nasir Khan and Ors. Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.