admin

[Civil Appeal Nos.1527-1536 of 2013] [Civil Appeal Nos.1557-1566/2013, 1577-1586/2013, 1597-1606/2013, 1537- 1546/2013, 1547-1556/2013, 1567-1576/2013, 1587-1596/2013, 1607-1608/2013, 1609-1610/2013, 1611-1612/2013, 1613-1614/2013, 1615-1616/2013, 1617- 1618/2013, 1619-1620/2013, 1621-1622/2013, 1623-1624/2013, 1625-1626/2013, 1627-1628/2013, 1629-1630/2013, 1631-1632/2013, 1633-1634/2013] [CA Nos.4183-4192/2015 @ SLP (C) Nos. 21344-21353/2013] ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. Leave granted in SLP [C] Nos.21344-21353/2015. 2. The appeals arise out of a common […]

[Civil Appeal No.4367 of 2004] O R D E R On being mentioned learned senior counsel has pointed out the typographical error in para 53 of the judgment where the remand is to be to jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals) instead of CESTAT. The error is corrected accordingly. …………….J. (A.K. Sikri) …………….J. (R.F. Nariman) New Delhi; April

[Civil Appeal No. 7642 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant herein is the manufacturer of Tyre Cord Yarn (TCY) and Tyre Cord Fabric (TCB) falling under Chapter 54 and 59 of the Central Excise Tariff Act respectively. The aforesaid goods TCY and TCB are manufactured by the appellant at its Goregaon factory. The

[Civil Appeal No. 5768 of 2006] P. Sreenivasulu Naidu Vs. Special Deputy Collector, Tirupathi & ANR.] [Civil Appeal No. 5769 of 2006] R.N. Rangamma Vs. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams & ANR.] [Civil Appeal No. 5770 of 2006] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. These appeals are filed against the common judgment and order dated 05.07.2004 passed by

[Criminal Appeal Nos . 701-702 /2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) Nos.5767-5768/2013] Raj Kumar Vs. Mahabir & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 703 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.6347/2013] Bharat Singh Vs. Rishi Pal & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 704 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.10739/2013] R. BANUMATHI J. 1. Leave granted.

[Civil Appeal No.6709 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. The facts of the present case reveal that the appellant started manufacturing duplicate CDs from a master tape/CD issued to them by a distributor who had copyright in the contents of the CD. The following chain will show exactly how the present transaction of job work

[Civil Appeal No.4367 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows. The appellant is engaged in ship breaking activity at Alang Ship Breaking Yard. The appellant imported a vessel, namely, M.V. Olinda, for the purpose of breaking the same, and filed a Bill of Entry when

[Civil Appeal No. 5541 of 2004] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Respondent is the holder of Central Excise Registration for manufacture of RCC and PSC pipes falling under Chapter Heading 6804/6807 for the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondent entered into four agreements for designing, manufacturing, providing at site, laying, jointing

[Civil Appeal No. 1906 of 2007] H.L. DATTU, CJI. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in TRC No. 412 of 2002 and Sales Tax Revision Nos. 321 and 326 of 2005, dated 23.12.2005, whereby and whereunder, the High Court has held that the