[Civil Appeal Nos. 10353-10354 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 31173-31174 of 2010] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These civil appeals are directed against the impugned judgment and orders dated 5.3.2008 and 3.8.2010 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 21553(C) of 2005 and Civil Misc. Review Application No. 93051 of […]
NEW DELHI: The Supreme court has stayed the trial of Tehelka founder-editor Tarun Tejpal, charged for allegedly raping a junior colleague, for three weeks. Hearing Tarun Tejpal’s plea, the apex court on Friday granted him three weeks to collect necessary documents. Tejpal’s appeal, filed by advocate Sandeep Kapur, had contended that the session court while
Sexual assault case: SC stays Tarun Tejpal’s trial for 3 weeks Read More »
NEW DELHI: A majority of states were opposed to any attempt at creating a special cadre to investigate crimes independent of the law-enforcement machinery, the central government told the Supreme Court as it began grappling afresh with the issue of ushering in major police reforms. Amicus curiae Harish Salve had suggested this as a way
Supreme Court asks centre to think afresh on crime probe cadre Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 10129 of 2010] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. The appellant has filed this appeal questioning the correctness of the Judgment and order dated 25.2.2009 passed in W.P. No.4048 of 2008 by the Division Bench of High Court of Judicature at Bombay affirming the order of Industrial Court, Pune dated 11.04.2008 whereby the Industrial
Recent SC Judgement – R.G. D’Souza Vs. Poona Employees Union – 18.11.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 10561 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.13941 of 2013] O R D E R Leave granted. During pendency of the appeal the parties to the litigation had made several serious efforts to settle their disputes and for that purpose they had several meetings but ultimately they had decided to get
Recent SC Judgement – Smt. Prachi Singh Patil Vs. Sri Rahul G. Patil – 17.11.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 10265 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8738 of 2014] R.K. Agrawal, J. 1. Leave granted 2. The sole question of law which arises for consideration in the present appeal is as to whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short ‘the Tribunal’) has the
[Criminal Appeal No. 1266 of 2013] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against Judgment and Order dated 12th March, 2013 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appral No.S-736-SB of 2003 upholding the conviction of the appellant under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC”)
Recent SC Judgement – Naresh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana – 14.11.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.162 of 2009] Uday U. Lalit, J. 1. This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 10.06.2008 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.1360 of 2001 setting aside the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Ld. XXV Additional Sessions Judge, Bangalore in Sessions Case
Recent SC Judgement – Krishna @ Krishnappa Vs. State of Karnataka – 14.11.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.19 of 2013] Uday U. Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by special leave to appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 18.03.2011 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal No.249/2000(A) by which it was pleased to affirm the order of conviction and sentence recorded by the learned
Recent SC Judgement – Antony Cardoza Vs. State of Kerala – 14.11.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.2298 of 2014] Uday U. Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by special leave to appeal arises out of final judgment and order dated 06.02.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Criminal Revision Petition No.165 of 1995 by which the High Court was pleased to dismiss the revision
Recent SC Judgement – Ratna @ Ratan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan – 14.11.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
