[Civil Appeal No. 5225 of 2008] S. A. BOBDE, J. 1. This appeal is placed before us by way of a reference, made by a two- Judge Bench of this Court, C.K. Thakker and Altamas Kabir, JJ. which heard the matter on an earlier occasion and held that the appeal deserves to be allowed and […]
Recent SC Judgement – KSL & Industries Ltd. Vs. M/s. Arihant Threads Ltd. – 27.10.14 Read More »
The Supreme Court on Monday denied bail to self-styled ‘godman’ Asaram on medical grounds. The apex court granted two weeks’ time to Asaram’s lawyers to look into the report submitted by the medical board consisting of AIIMS doctors. 72-year-old Asaram had applied for bail submitting a medical report by a Jodhpur hospital, which recommended a
Supreme Court denies bail to Asaram on medical ground Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday declined to interfere with the schedule for panchayat elections in Rajasthan. The schedule is being held under the amended provisions that specify educational qualifications for the gram sarpanch and the membership of the other panchayat and zilla samiti bodies. The apex court bench headed by Chief Justice HL
SC refuses to interfere in Rajasthan panchayat polls Read More »
KOLKATA: West Bengal’s ruling Trinamool Congress on Sunday indicated it might move the Supreme Court against the “misuse” of the CBI by the central government in the Saradha scam probe to “settle political scores” with the party. “Nothing has been finalized yet. Yes, moving the Supreme Court is definitely an option before us. The centre
Trinamool may move SC against CBI ‘misuse’ Read More »
JAIPUR: The Congress and other major political parties in the state excluding BJP will file a petition in the Supreme Court on Monday against an ordinance brought by the Rajasthan government setting a minimum education qualification for candidates contesting panchayat polls. Congress along with JD(U), RLD, SP, NCP and CPM will jointly approach the SC
Congress to approach SC against education qualification in panchayat polls Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.2228 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.1724 of 2013] Gunmala Sales Private Ltd., etc. Vs. Navkar Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. & etc. [Criminal Appeal Nos.2261-2265 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) Nos.5500-5504 of 2013] Gunmala Sales Private Ltd., etc. Vs. Navkar Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. & etc.
Recent SC Judgement – Gunmala Sales Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anu Mehta – 17.10.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.2267 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.1453 of 2013] M.Y. Eqbal, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave arises out of judgment and order dated 3.1.2013 of the High Court of Uttarakhand in Criminal Appeal No.213 of 2006, whereby Division Bench of the High Court dismissed
Recent SC Judgement – Kuldeep Kaur Vs. State of Uttarakhand – 17.10.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos.9844-9846 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 23051-23053 of 2009] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals by special leave are directed against the common judgment and order dated 20.3.2009, passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Calcutta in W.P.L.R.T. Nos. 728 of 2002, 429
Recent SC Judgement – Pradeep Kumar Maskara Vs. State of West Bengal – 17.10.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 9849 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 18639 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. Leave granted. This appeal, preferred by the State of Uttar Pradesh and its functionaries, assails the order of the High Court whereby the writ petition filed by the appellants has been dismissed and the order of the
Recent SC Judgement – State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava – 17.10.14 Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Union home ministry on Friday defended its decision to put four US-based NGOs on the watch list and subject all foreign contributions received by them in India to prior clearance, stating that they were flouting norms by receiving remittances in personal accounts instead of their designated FCRA account. As per the Foreign
US-based NGOs put on watch list were flouting FCRA Act, MHA says Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
