admin

[Civil Appeal No. 8136 of 2024] K. Vinod Chandran, J. 1. A young man of 20 years was rendered immobile with paraplegia for reason of the fracture of C4-5 sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The claimantvictim, who is now represented by his mother in the appeal, was travelling pillion when a car driven negligently and […]

[Civil Appeal No. 12567/2024] N.V. Anjaria 1. Heard learned counsels for the respective parties. 2. The present appeal preferred by the original claimant is directed against the judgment and order dated 23.01.2020 of the High Court of Karnataka in M.F.A. No.2903 of 2018 (MV), whereby the High Court allowed in part the appeal of the

[Civil Appeal No._________ @ SLP (C) No. 19976 of 2019] N.V. Anjaria, J. 1. Leave granted. Heard learned Advocate for the appellant. 2. This appeal preferred by the Insurance Company is directed against a common judgment and order dated 25.04.2019 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand whereby the High Court dismissed the Appeal from

[Civil Appeal No. 5172 of 2025] K. Vinod Chandran, J. 1. The appellants are the claimants who impugn the judgement of the High Court rejecting the claim petition, after reversing the award of the Tribunal. The claimants alleged that the only breadwinner of their family, the husband of the first appellant, died in a hit and

[Criminal Appeal No. 596 of 2014] B.R.GavaI, CJI. FACTUAL ASPECTS 1. The present appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 4th July 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad1 in Criminal Appeal u/s 374 Cr.P.C. No. 2259 of 1989 filed by the accused appellants whereby, the High Court

[Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5248 of 2016] [Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9333 of 2016] K. Vinod Chandran, J. 1. The Special Leave Petitions are filed against the order of the High Court, quashing the crime registered by the Anti-Corruption Bureau Police Station, City Range-I, Hyderabad as against A4. 2. Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, learned Senior Counsel

[Criminal Appeal No(s). 1954-1956 of 2013] Mehta, J. 1. Heard. 2. The appellant-State of Rajasthan has filed these appeals assailing the common final judgment and order dated 14th December, 2011, passed by the Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur1 in D.B. Criminal Appeal Nos. 95 of 2008, 122 of 2008, and 166 of 2008 filed

[Civil Appeal Nos. 11018-11019 of 2024] [SLP (C) No. 10419/2024] [SLP (C) No. 11655/2024] [SLP (C) No. 12924/2024] [SLP (C) No. 12925/2024] [SLP (C) No. 21909/2024] [SLP (C) No. 21056/2024] [W.P. (C) No. 489/2024] [SLP (C) No. 314/2025] Dipankar Datta, J. 1. The present batch of civil appeals and special leave petitions1 assail the common

[Criminal Appeal No.__________ of 2025 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 12584 of 2024] Atul S. Chandurkar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants who are the father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the 2nd respondent – the complainant are aggrieved by the rejection of their application seeking quashing of the First Information Report (for short, “the FIR”)

[Civil Appeal No. 10800 of 2024] Dipankar Datta, J. THE APPEAL 1. The present appeal assails the judgment and order dated 6th December, 2023 passed by the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh1 in LPA No. 562/2022 (O&M), affirming the decision of the Single Judge whereby the first respondent was directed