The Consumer Protection Act excludes services for “commercial purpose” from its purview, but does not define this term. This has lead to chaos as the term is being interpreted differently by different judges and there is no consistency. Hence, outcome of the case has no judicial certainty and depends on the luck of the party. […]
Consumers Act fails to define commercial purpose Read More »
WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama moved to prevent US anger at North Korea from spiraling out of control on Sunday by saying the massive hacking of Sony Pictures was not an act of war but instead was cyber-vandalism. Washington’s longstanding dispute with North Korea, which for years has centered on its nuclear weapons program, has
Obama says Sony hack not an act of war Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1366 of 2010] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (for short the “IPC”). Under Section 304-B IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years while
Recent SC Judgement – Sultan Singh Vs. State of Haryana – 26.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 3982-3987 of 2011] [C.A. Nos.7916-7918 of 2011] [C.A. No. 10207 of 2011] [C.A. Nos. 7547-7549 of 2013] [C.A. Nos. 7707-7709 of 2013] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. These groups of appeals have been filed against the impugned Judgment and order dated 10.12.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at
Recent SC Judgement – Nirmal Singh Vs. State of Haryana through Collector– 26.09.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 775 of 2007] Surang Lal Yadav Vs. State of Bihar [Criminal Appeal No. 1163 of 2007] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. These appeals are preferred by the appellants/accused aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 566 of
Recent SC Judgement – Anup Lal Yadav Vs. State of Bihar – 26.09.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal Nos. 1973-1974 of 2008] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. This is an exceptional case where this Court has taken serious note, the way the Sessions Judge disposed of the Sessions case within a period of nine days, which can be briefly narrated herein-below: 29.12.2004: Charges were framed and the case was adjourned to 1.1.2005.
Recent SC Judgement – Patel Maheshbhai Ranchodbhai Vs. State of Gujarat – 26.09.14 Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has held that phone chargers sold with mobile phone should be taxed separately as it is not part of phone but an accessory and turned down a plea by Nokia for treating charger and mobile as a composite product. The apex court said that merely making one package of cell
Levy tax on chargers sold with phones: SC Read More »
NEW DELHI: Recovery of excess amount paid to Class-III and Class-IV employees due to employer’s mistake is not permissible in law, the Supreme Court has ruled saying that it would cause extremely harsh consequences to them who are totally dependent on their wages to run their family. The apex court said employees of lower rung
Can’t recover excess salary paid to class III, IV staff: SC Read More »
NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday strongly condemned grant of bail to 26/11 key plotter Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, saying India’s disappointment had been conveyed to Pakistan in the sternest of words as the relief to the top Lashkar terrorist soon after the murder of school children in Peshawar comes as a shock. Speaking in
Pak court’s move blurs political divide in House Read More »
HYDERABAD/NEW DELHI: For a government that claims only bureaucrats above board will be appointed to senior positions, it came as an embarrassment on Friday as education secretary SN Mohanty appeared before a special CBI court in Hyderabad along with 11 other accused in a disproportionate assets case against YSR Congress chief Jagan Mohan Reddy. Charge-sheeted
HRD secretary charged in Jagan Reddy assets case Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
