Maintaining that no further indulgence could be given to them, the Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected applications by the two Italian marines, demanding further relaxation of their bail conditions. The marines are accused of killing two fishermen off Kerala coast in 2012. While Massimilano Latorre had sought extension of his stay in Italy by another […]
[Civil Appeal No. 6307 of 2010] J.S.KHEHAR, J. 1. The Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Vikas Parishad’) is a corporate body. It came into existence, consequent upon the promulgation of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘1965 Act’). The employees of
Recent SC Judgement –State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Preetam Singh– 23.09.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.1255 of 1999] [Criminal Appeal No.1256 of 1999] [Criminal Appeal No.1367 of 1999] [Writ Petition (C) No.316 of 2008] [Contempt Petition (C) No.47 of 2011] [Writ Petition (C) No.316 of 2008] [Transferred Case (C) No.27 of 2011] O R D E R R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. On 03.09.2014, the arguments were heard on
[Criminal Appeal No. 1422 of 2009] Mahender Singh Alias Mahender Gulati Vs. State of Haryana and Another [Criminal Appeal Nol.1423 of 2009] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. These appeals are directed against judgment and order dated 06.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No. 342-DB of 2006, whereby the High
Recent SC Judgement –Prem Kumar Gulati Vs. State of Haryana – 23.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 9036 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.25056 of 2012] PRAFULLA C.PANT,J. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.2.2012 passed in CMA No.2862 of 2011 by the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby the said Court has allowed the appeal filed by the husband
Recent SC Judgement –Vidhya Viswanathan Vs. Kartik Balakrishnan – 22.09.14 Read More »
A sessions court in New Delhi has asked a trial court to retry a road accident case, in which a DTC van driver was acquitted, saying “a vehicle may be rashly or negligently driven even without high speed.” Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala asked the trial court judge to conduct re-trial of the case, in
Delhi Court: Driving may be rash, negligent even without high speed Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday permitted newly-appointed CBI director Anil Sinha to take over the probe into 2G cases. The apex court passed the order on an application by the probe agency seeking clarification on its earlier order removing former Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) chief Ranjit Sinha from the investigation and prosecution
SC allows new CBI chief to take over probe into 2G cases Read More »
NEW DELHI: In a setback to Cipla, the homegrown generics medicine company, the government has so far found little merit in its plea for waiver and cancellation of patent rights for five drugs over which Novartis has exclusive rights. Sources told TOI that the health ministry has suggested that Cipla’s proposal for a compulsory licence
Government may not act on Cipla’s patent plea Read More »
KOLKATA: The political circles might be abuzz with the arrest of cabinet minister for sports and transport MadanMitra by the CBI, the central agency is already looking forward in terms of collecting evidence against influential men. What has not gone unnoticed, therefore, is the arrest of Saradha boss Sudipta Sen’s legal counsel NareshBhalotia by the
Interrogation of Sen’s lawyer holds key: CBI Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1555 of 2008] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and also learned counsel for the respondent State. We have already discussed all the facts and circumstances of the case in Criminal Appeal Nos.1551-1554 of 2008 filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the same have
Recent SC Judgement –Tejpal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 22.09.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
