Law Intellect India

News

Will name some black money account holders, PM tells Cabinet

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is learnt to have told his union council of ministers on Monday that the government would disclose some names of those under probe for allegedly stashing black money abroad, to the Supreme Court when it reconvenes after the Diwali break. “Kuch naam batayenge (we will reveal some names),” Modi told his ministers […]

Will name some black money account holders, PM tells Cabinet Read More »

Life in jail for 5 Dhaula Kuan rapists, judge says ‘beasts’ unfit for society

Calling the convicts “psychopaths” who should be kept away from society, a Delhi court on Monday sentenced all five convicts in the 2010 Dhaula Kuan gangrape case to life in prison. “The convicts are psychopaths, having no regard for the honour and dignity of women in the society and thus are a threat to the whole society.

Life in jail for 5 Dhaula Kuan rapists, judge says ‘beasts’ unfit for society Read More »

Petition for RTI website and telephone help-lines by States and UTs in SC

A petition filed by Supreme Court lawyer, Rajeev Agrawal demands a comprehensive website that upholds the spirit of RTI Act, wherein citizens can file RTI applications and appeals online in all the States, Union Territories, State Information Commission’s. It also demands a Voice based facilitation centre for registration and processing of RTI Applications, complaints, Appeals

Petition for RTI website and telephone help-lines by States and UTs in SC Read More »

Bar Council of Kerala to restrain lawyers from providing case details to media

Bar Council of Kerala has asked lawyers to confine their views only as legal experts, regarding details of ongoing cases. It is considering plans to restrain lawyers from discussing case details with the media, relying on Section 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. According to Rule 36, “An advocate shall not solicit work or

Bar Council of Kerala to restrain lawyers from providing case details to media Read More »

Destruction of record during pendency of RTI even as per weeding out policy is wrong: CIC

The CIC Prof M Sridhar Acharyulu held that during the pendency of RTI application relevant record should not be destroyed by public authority even if its weeding out policy permits. The CIC cautioned that such a destruction of record would be serious breach of Right to Information Act and directed to explain why penalty could

Destruction of record during pendency of RTI even as per weeding out policy is wrong: CIC Read More »

Delhi High Court upholds SEBI circular which increased period of limitation for invoking arbitration

The Delhi high court on Thursday upheld a 2011 circular issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India that increased the period of limitation for invoking arbitration from six months to three years. According to the petitioner, the circulars issued by SEBI were detrimental to the interest of the investors and have been issued

Delhi High Court upholds SEBI circular which increased period of limitation for invoking arbitration Read More »

Jethmalani’s Advocate on Record Karnjanwala and Co. withdraws their Vakalath in Black Money Case after Jethmalani blamed Finance Minister and AG

Petitioner in the Black money case Senior Advocate Ram Jethmalani had suffered another setback after his Advocate-on Record Karanjanwala & Company decided to withdraw their Vakalath because of Mr.Jethmalani’s statement against Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, reports Times of India. It was on Mr.Jethmalani’s plea the Supreme Court had set-up a special

Jethmalani’s Advocate on Record Karnjanwala and Co. withdraws their Vakalath in Black Money Case after Jethmalani blamed Finance Minister and AG Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.