Law Intellect India

News

Destruction of record during pendency of RTI even as per weeding out policy is wrong: CIC

The CIC Prof M Sridhar Acharyulu held that during the pendency of RTI application relevant record should not be destroyed by public authority even if its weeding out policy permits. The CIC cautioned that such a destruction of record would be serious breach of Right to Information Act and directed to explain why penalty could

Destruction of record during pendency of RTI even as per weeding out policy is wrong: CIC Read More »

Delhi High Court upholds SEBI circular which increased period of limitation for invoking arbitration

The Delhi high court on Thursday upheld a 2011 circular issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India that increased the period of limitation for invoking arbitration from six months to three years. According to the petitioner, the circulars issued by SEBI were detrimental to the interest of the investors and have been issued

Delhi High Court upholds SEBI circular which increased period of limitation for invoking arbitration Read More »

Jethmalani’s Advocate on Record Karnjanwala and Co. withdraws their Vakalath in Black Money Case after Jethmalani blamed Finance Minister and AG

Petitioner in the Black money case Senior Advocate Ram Jethmalani had suffered another setback after his Advocate-on Record Karanjanwala & Company decided to withdraw their Vakalath because of Mr.Jethmalani’s statement against Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, reports Times of India. It was on Mr.Jethmalani’s plea the Supreme Court had set-up a special

Jethmalani’s Advocate on Record Karnjanwala and Co. withdraws their Vakalath in Black Money Case after Jethmalani blamed Finance Minister and AG Read More »

Litigant tried to overreach the Bench hearing her Case by circulating Justice Krishnaiyer’s letter to Lodha; Justice Ranjana Desai and Justice Ramana recused from hearing the Case

In a matrimonial Dispute pending before the Supreme Court the Petitioner wife had circulated a letter purportedly written by Justice V.R.Krishnaiyer to the then Chief Justice of India R.M.Lodha in the residence of Justice Ranjana Desai and Justice Ramana, who were hearing the Case. The Bench deprecated the conduct of the Petitioner-wife and recused from

Litigant tried to overreach the Bench hearing her Case by circulating Justice Krishnaiyer’s letter to Lodha; Justice Ranjana Desai and Justice Ramana recused from hearing the Case Read More »

I am not going to be cowed down or lose heart: AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa

Putting up a brave front, AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa on Sunday assured party workers that she will come out of the present case as she had successfully faced many challenges, saying her “public life amounted to swimming in a sea of inferno.” In her first statement after walking out of the Parappana Agrahara Central Prison at

I am not going to be cowed down or lose heart: AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa Read More »

‘Astonishing’ links between ex-CBI chief A P Singh and Moin Qureshi, ‘pained’ AG tells SC

The Centre told the Supreme Court on Friday in strong words that an income tax report has disclosed “astonishing state of affairs” between former CBI director A P Singh and meat exporter Moin Qureshi and that Singh’s conduct was “wholly unbecoming of the office he held”. The report has, however, given a clean chit to

‘Astonishing’ links between ex-CBI chief A P Singh and Moin Qureshi, ‘pained’ AG tells SC Read More »

CBI chief’s meetings with 2G accused improper: Special public prosecutor

The special public prosecutor in the 2G case has told the Supreme Court that it was “definitely improper” for CBI director Ranjit Sinha to frequently meet those accused in the coal and 2G scam cases and these meetings could not be a matter of Sinha’s right to privacy. The prosecutor also stressed that the alleged

CBI chief’s meetings with 2G accused improper: Special public prosecutor Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.