Recent Judgement

[Special Leave Petition (C) No. 25032 of 2014] Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. The present petition has been filed impugning order1 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court2. Along with the petition, an application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 1,633 days in filing the present petition. 2. A perusal of the […]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 6772-6773 of 2023] Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. 1. A routine service dispute involving competing claims for appointment was transformed into a pleasurable discourse by the newly designated senior advocates of this court, Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Mr. Gagan Gupta. Mr. D.L. Chidananda, appearing for the respondent-State rose to

[Criminal Appeal No. 2367 of 2024 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 5530 of 2023] Vishal Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 2368 of 2024 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 6321 of 2024 Diary No. 29192 of 2023] 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeals arise out of a decision of the High

[Civil Appeal No(s)._______ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 43 of 2022] Mehta, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27th September, 2021 passed by the learned Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu in LPA No. 38 of 2020

[Civil Appeal Nos. 1636-1637 of 2016] Abhay S.Oka, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The facts of the case are glaring. The respondents are the owners of the lands subject matter of these appeals. At the instance of the Ministry of Defence, acquisition proceedings were initiated under the Requisitioning and

[Criminal Appeal No. 467/2024] [Criminal Appeal No. 468/2024] Abhay S. Oka, J 1. The appellants are accused who have been convicted by the Trial Court for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 323, read with Sections 149, 147, and 148 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellants have been sentenced to life imprisonment for the

[Civil Appeal No. 3940 of 2024] Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. 1. The issue for consideration before us is whether the timeline for refund under Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 20041 must be mandatorily followed while recovering dues under the Act by adjusting them against the refund amount. 2. The brief facts relevant

[Criminal Appeal No._______ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1074 of 2017] [Criminal Appeal No._______ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 9482 of 2021] [Criminal Appeal No._______ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 5419 of 2022] Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. Leave granted in the above matters. 2. The concerns

[Civil Appeal No.________ of 2024 @ SLP (C) No. 5817 of 2023] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 23514 of 2023] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 27620 of 2023] Sanjay Kumar, J 1. Leave granted only in SLP (C) No. 5817 of 2023. 2. One lapse on the part of the State is all it took to generate

[Civil Appeal No. 1627 of 2016] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. This is plaintiff’s appeal arising out of a suit for possession and confirmation of his possession over the suit land which was decreed in his favour by the court of first instance but the decree was set aside in First Appeal and was affirmed by the