Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No.3042 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. In this appeal we are concerned with the addition in the value for assessment to customs duty of charges paid by the respondent to Met Chem Canada Inc. for supply of technical services required for setting up and commissioning a plant for the manufacture of Hot […]

[I.A. No. 6/2015 & I.A. No. 7/2015 in Civil Appeal No (S).226-227/2015] O R D E R I.A. NO.6 Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant does not want to press this I.A. The I.A. is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. I.A. NO.7 I.A. No.7 is allowed in terms of prayer ‘a’.

[CRL. M.P. Nos. 3655-3656/2015 in Criminal Appeals No(S). 1240-1241/2010] [CRL. M.P. Nos. 3653-3654/2015 in Criminal Appeals No(S). 1242-1243/2010] O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. These Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed in terms of prayer ‘a’ in these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions. Necessary corrections may be carried out accordingly. …………………………..J. [FAKKIR MOHAMED

[Writ Petition (C) No.129 of 2006] O R D E R Pursuant to our order dated 06.02.2015, the Ministry of Home Affairs has filed an affidavit dated 8th April, 2015. We have heard learned counsel for the parties in considerable detail. A meeting was convened by the Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government

[Criminal Appeal No.1581 of 2009] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by special leave challenges the judgment and order dated 20.11.2007 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissing Criminal Revision No.550 of 2007 preferred by the Appellant through her natural guardian. By dismissing said criminal revision the High Court affirmed the view taken

[Criminal Appeal No.566 of 2008] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by Special Leave challenges the judgment and order dated 22.08.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in DB Criminal Jail Appeal No. 27 of 2003 acquitting the Respondent herein of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with

[Criminal Appeal Nos.2071-2072 of 2008] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. These appeals by Special Leave are directed against the judgment and order dated 7.12.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Nagpur in Crl. Appeal Nos. 255 of 2001 and 306 of 2004. 2. Deceased Sadhana, daughter of PW 5 Narmadabai,

[Criminal Appeal No.2082 of 2008] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by special leave seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 11.02.2008 in DB-Criminal Appeal No.338 of 1983 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur acquitting the respondents of the offences punishable under Sections 147, 302 read with Section

[Criminal Appeal No. 486 of 2010] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 7.09.2009 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 770-DB of 2006, whereby the Division Bench has confirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by

[Civil Appeal No.3581 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13697 of 2012] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 11th November, 2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ- C No.62471 of 2011 by which the writ petition