Recent Judgement

[Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 88-89 of 2013 in Civil Appeal No. 8226-8227 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. These contempt proceedings arise out of the judgment and order dated 23.11.2012 passed by this Court in CA Nos. 8226-8227 of 2012. Before we take note of the exact nature of directions given in that judgment which […]

[Civil Appeal No. 5379-5380/2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition(C) Nos.10265-10266 of 2014] M.Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. Appellants have preferred these appeals by special leave against the interim order dated 3.4.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi in LPA No.238 of 2014 and LPA No. 237 of 2014 whereby the Division

[Original Suit No. 3 of 2006] R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. This Court remains seized of the problem with regard to the water level of Mullaperiyar dam after it had solved on 27.02.2006 (Mullaperiyar Environmental Protection Forum[1]) because the Kerala State Legislature enacted the law immediately thereafter fixing and limiting Full Reservoir Level (FRL) to 136

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5397-5406/2014 arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) Nos.36319-36328/2009] [C.A.Nos.5407-5409/2014 @ SLP (Civil) Nos.36330-36332/2009] [C.A. Nos.5413-5422/2014 @ SLP (civil) Nos.36334-36343/2009] [C.A.Nos.5410-5412/2014 @ SLP (Civil) Nos.36344-36346/2009] [C.A.Nos.5439-5441/2014 @ SLP (civil) Nos.36347-36349/2009] [C.A.Nos.5426-5428/2014 @ SLP (Civil) Nos.36350-36352/2009] [C.A. Nos.5429-5438/2014 @ SLP (Civil) Nos. 36353-36362/2009] [C.A. Nos.5423-5425/2014 @ SLP (Civil) Nos. 36363-36365/2009] A.K.SIKRI,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The

[Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 57 of 2014] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. I. Should we be hearing this case? Would it not be better, for another Bench to hear this case? 1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayers:- “(a) Declare the order dated 4.3.2014 as void, nullity and non-est in

[Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.453 of 2014] O R D E R 1. This petition has been filed against the interim order dated 27.12.2013, passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No.2012 of 2006. 2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this petition are : A. That an FIR C.R.

[Civil Appeal No. 6194 of 2013 arising out of SLP (C) No.2933 of 2010] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25th November, 2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Civil Revision Application No.272 of 2009. By the impugned judgment the High Court dismissed the

[Writ Petition (C) No. 232 of 2005] [Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 298/2005, 487/2005, 528/2005, 67/2006, 511/2006, 75/2007, 519/2008, 531/2008, 548/2008, 569/2008, 186/2009, 23/2010, 62/2010, 232/2010, 279/2010, 377/2010, 112/2011, 137/2011, 181/2011, 207/2011, 278/2011, 243/2011, 372/2011, 398/2011, 381/2011, 468/2011, 547/2011, 107/2012, 125/2012, 196/2012, 263/2012, 404/2012, 567/2012, 145/2013, 241/2013, 454/2013, 404/2013, 723/2013, 440/2012, 441/2012, 156/2013, 533/2013, 403/2012, 824/2013,

[Special Leave Petition (C) No. 33644/2011] A.K.SIKRI,J. 1. The petitioner herein had filed Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation. In that petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of Section 3 of the M.P. State

[Civil Appeal No. 8621 of 2010] [C.A. No. 1181 of 2012] [C.A. No. 2337 of 2011] [C.A. No. 5322 of 2010] [C.A. No. 8622 of 2010] [C.A. No. 8623 of 2010] [C.A. No. 8624 of 2010] [C.A. No. 8625 of 2010] [C.A. No. 8626 of 2010] [C.A. No. 8627 of 2010] [C.A. No. 8628 of