Recent Judgement

[Arbitration Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2008] The petitioner is a former employee of Coca-Cola India, Inc., the respondent No.2 herein. At the time of joining the respondent company an agreement dated 20.09.1995 was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent No.2, relevant features of which will be noticed in due course. It appears that […]

[Civil Appeal No. 4494 of 2004] M/s. Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd., Chennai Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Tamil Nadu-I [Civil Appeal Nos. 4491-4493 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant-assessee is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. Its main objective, as stated in the Memorandum of Association, is to acquire the

[Criminal Appeal No.457 of 2008] J.S.KHEHAR, J The appellant (Ravinder Kaur) and the respondent (Anil Kumar) got married on 14.08.1991. Soon thereafter, the respondent preferred a petition seeking divorce from the appellant before the Additional District Judge, Ropar. Having received summons in the above-mentioned case, the appellant entered appearance before the Additional District Judge, Ropar,

[Criminal Appeal No. 152 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 153 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 154 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 155 of 2012] JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. The appellants, while being engaged in the business of stocking iron ore, had allegedly violated certain norms prescribed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 22 of the

[Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8850 of 2015] Bajrang Bahadur Singh Vs. His Excellency, the Governor of U.P. & Others [Transferred Case No.60 of 2015] Chelameswar, J. 1. One Bajrang Bahadur Singh respondent no. 1 in SLP(C) No. 8850/2015 and the petitioner in Transferred Case No. 60/2015 (hereinafter being referred to as the petitioner for the

[Criminal Appeal No.594 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 108 of 2015] O R D E R V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 14.07.2014 passed in Criminal Petition No. 2859 of 2012 by the High Court of Judicature of Karnataka at Bangalore, wherein the High

[Contempt Petition (C) No. 421 of 2014 in Civil Appeal No. 4831 of 2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.428/2014 in C.A. No.4815/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.431/2014 in C.A. No.4823/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.427/2014 in C.A. No.4836/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.424/2014 in C.A. No.4824/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.432/2014 in C.A. No.4828/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.423/2014 in C.A.

[Review Petition (CRL.) No.474 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal No.1728 of 2007] We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the review petitioner and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent, at length. We have gone through the judgment sought to be reviewed and we have considered the arguments advanced on both sides.

[Civil Appeal No. 2957 of 2007] AMITAVA ROY,J. The oft encountered debate on the extent of tax liability based on the classification of the determinants of a levy in law seeks judicial scrutiny in the attendant factual conspectus. The appellant being aggrieved by the determination made by the High Court of Gujarat on the issue

[Civil Appeal No.3391 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.19487 of 2014] M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 04.04.2014 of the Gauhati High Court whereby the revision petition filed by the respondents was allowed and the eviction suit filed