Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No…………………. of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.22035 of 2013] [Contempt Petition (C) No. 287 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No…………………. of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.22035 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No……………….of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.29740 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals […]

[Civil Appeal No. 4189 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 29888 of 2010] Dipak Misra, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal, by special leave, by the landlord arises out of and is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.8.2010 of the Bombay High Court passed in Civil Revision Application No. 355

[Criminal Appeal No. 696 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.2085 of 2012] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.04.2011 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh affirming the order of conviction passed by the Additional Special Judge for SPE & ACB

[Criminal Appeal No. 698 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 10337 of 2013] Balkrishan Rajendraprasad Chaubey Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & ANR. [Criminal Appeal No. 699 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 10600 of 2013] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. Leave granted in both the appeals. 2. These appeals are directed against

[Civil Appeal No.2529 of 2002] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. By a communication dated 17.5.2000 issued by the Registrar General of the Patna High Court the respondent herein was informed that he would retire from the service on completion of 58 years of age. The said communication of the Registrar General was, inter alia, based on

[Suo Motu Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 24 of 2014] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. This Court, based on the news item published in the Business and Financial News dated 23.01.2014 relating to the gang-rape of a 20 year old woman of Subalpur Village, P.S. Labpur, District Birbhum, State of West Bengal on the intervening night of 20/21.01.2014

[Civil Appeal No. 2240 of 2006] O R D E R 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in W.P. [T] No.4572 of 2004, dated 22.06.2005. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has set aside the letter issued by the

CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,J. Petitioners have been summoned in a complaint case for commission of offence under Section 323, 380 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”. Respondent No. 1 filed a complaint in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Jangipur, Murshidabad on 1st

[Criminal Appeal No.686/2014 arising out of S.L.P.(Criminal) No.9547 of 2013] A.K.SIKRI,J. 1. The present Special Leave Petition has been preferred against the impugned judgment/final order dated 8.10.2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.27343/2013. It was a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

[Criminal Appeal No. 687 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 2634 of 2013] P.Sathasivam, CJI. 1. Leave granted. 2. The above appeal is filed against the final impugned judgment and order dated 29.06.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Writ Petition No. 220 of 2010 wherein the High