Recent Judgement

[Writ Petition (Civil) No.13 of 2015] [Writ Petition (Civil) Nos.14, 18, 23, 24, 70, 83, 108 & 124 of 2015] [Transfer Petition (Civil) No.391 of 2015] O R D E R ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. In this group of petitions, validity of the Constitution (Ninety- Ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 and the National Judicial Appointment […]

[Civil Appeal No.3585 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.15901 of 2014] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In view of the order dated 23rd March, 2015, passed by the Presiding Officer of Industrial Tribunal No.2 at Vadodara in Reference (I.T.) No.12 of 2005 in pursuance of order passed by this Court

[Criminal Appeal Nos.564-565 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) Nos. 6380-6381 of 2014] Dipak Misra, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. When centuries old obstructions are removed, age old shackles are either burnt or lost their force, the chains get rusted, and the human endowments and virtues are not indifferently treated and emphasis is laid

[Criminal Appeal No. 554 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 8663 of 2014] Prafulla C. Pant, J. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 8.8.2014, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, whereby Criminal Appeal No. S-1389-SB has been dismissed, and conviction of accused (appellant) Jasbir Singh @ Javri

[Civil Appeal No.9363 of 2011] [C.A.No.9147 of 2011] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. These civil appeals are directed against judgment of Bombay High Court dated 31.08.2010 in W.P.(L) No.1915 of 2010 and dated 10.08.2010 in W.P.No.316 of 2010 respectively whereby the writ petitions preferred by the appellants were dismissed. For the sake of brevity facts have

[Civil Appeal No. 3272 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.15900 of 2013] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Leave granted. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment delivered by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court on March 8, 2013 in A.P.O. No.180 of 2012 whereby the High Court while holding that the

[Civil Appeal No. 7377 of 2008] [Civil Appeal Nos. 8635-8636 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 8637-8638 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 6184-6185 of 2010] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Civil Appeal No. 7377 of 2008 is filed against the judgment and order dated 19.10.2005 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

[Civil Appeal No. 8912 of 2003] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. What is the correct method of computation of deductions under Section 80HHC(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the given facts and circumstances, is the question which needs an answer in the present appeal. 2. The given facts and circumstances, as they appear on

[Civil Appeal No.3238 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 1865 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-claimants against the Judgment and order dated 25.07.2013 passed in FAO No. 1652 of 2010 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, wherein the High

[Civil Appeal Nos.2729-2730 of 2004] R. F. NARIMAN, J. The present case concerns itself with a classification issue. The facts necessary to appreciate the controversy are as follows: – The appellant manufactures security holograms. At the very beginning of the manufacturing process, they use coated metallised film which we are informed is classified under Tariff