Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No. 2807 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. In the present appeal filed by the assessee, it is seeking refund of duty which was initially paid by M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘BPCL’). According to the appellant, this duty was paid by it to the BPCL on purchase of Naphtha […]

[Criminal Appeal No.520 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 5825 of 2014] Dipak Misra, J. Long back, an eminent thinker and author, Sophocles, had to say: “Law can never be enforced unless fear supports them.” Though the aforesaid statement was made centuries back, it has its pertinence, in a way, with the enormous

[Civil Appeal No. 2609 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant herein was engaged in the manufacture of certain articles from vulcanized rubber as bushes for use in the motor vehicles. Indubitably, the appellant is a Small Scale Industrial unit (hereinafter referred to as ‘SSI’ for short). The appellant has its own brand name

[Civil Appeal Nos.3211-3212 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 1668-1669 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the final judgment and order dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in M.A. No.480 of 2008, wherein the High Court

[Civil Appeal Nos.3209-3210 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.7105-7106 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Delay condoned. Leave granted. These appeals have been filed by the appellant against the final judgment and order dated 23.07.2013 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 551 of 2013 in Misc. Civil Application No.3071 of 2012 in Special

[Criminal Appeal No. 205 of 2009] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. This is an appeal by the Complainant against the impugned judgment and order dated 30-04-2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.1674 of 2006. In the impugned judgment the High Court had allowed the appeal of three accused

[Civil Appeal No. 3213 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.5840 of 2012] N.M. Ravi Vs. P.R. Yelumalai [Civil Appeal No. 3214 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.10852 of 2013] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave is granted in both the matters. 2. These cross appeals have been filed against the judgment

[Civil Appeal No. 7130 of 2003] A.K.SIKRI, J. 1. The first respondent herein wanted to import into India a trophy of one stuffed leopard which he shot in Zambia. Leopard is protected and prohibited specie under Schedule I of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and also under the Convention of International Trade on Endangered

Interlocutory Application No.2 Of 2014 (For Correction/Modification of Appearance in Order Dated 08.12.2014 and Judgment Dated 16.12.2014 [Civil Appeal No.11439 of 2014] O R D E R Mr. Vikas Mehta, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant-Respondent No.4 has submitted that Shri Aditya Sondhi, learned senior counsel, had in fact not appeared in the matter and

[Civil Appeal No. 2381 of 2007] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and final order dated 18.07.2006, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 2588 of 1998, whereby the High Court has upheld and modified the Award passed by the Industrial